EstatePass
FinancingTransfer_taxesHARD

Sandra, a New Jersey resident, sells her home in Teaneck for $999,000. Her buyer, Kevin, tells his agent that he is relieved to be just under the $1,000,000 mansion tax threshold. Sandra's agent, however, notices that the contract also includes $15,000 worth of furniture and personal property that Kevin is purchasing separately in a side agreement. Which statement BEST describes the mansion tax risk in this transaction?

Correct Answer

C) If the total consideration for the transaction — including personal property — is deemed to be $1,014,000, the mansion tax of 1% could apply to the entire amount, triggering a $10,140 obligation for Kevin

This is an expert-level trap scenario. The New Jersey mansion tax is based on the total 'consideration' paid for the property. When parties structure a transaction to artificially keep the real estate contract price below $1,000,000 while simultaneously executing a separate side agreement for personal property, New Jersey tax authorities may aggregate the total consideration paid. If the combined total is $1,014,000 ($999,000 + $15,000), the mansion tax of 1% could apply to the entire $1,014,000 — not just the excess over $1,000,000 — resulting in a $10,140 obligation for Kevin. This practice of artificially splitting consideration is a known audit risk under the RTF Act.

Answer Options
A
There is no mansion tax risk because the real estate contract price of $999,000 is below the $1,000,000 threshold
B
The $15,000 side agreement for personal property is entirely separate and has no effect on the mansion tax calculation
C
If the total consideration for the transaction — including personal property — is deemed to be $1,014,000, the mansion tax of 1% could apply to the entire amount, triggering a $10,140 obligation for Kevin
D
The mansion tax would apply only to the $15,000 personal property portion because that pushed the total over $1,000,000

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Financing Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Financing

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Financing

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Financing Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

mansion_taxconsiderationtax_avoidanceexpert_trapside_agreement

Related Concepts

A comparison of the major mortgage loan types—conventional, FHA, VA, and USDA—covering their eligibility requirements, down payment amounts, mortgage insurance rules, and best use cases.

Predatory lending refers to unfair, deceptive, or abusive lending practices that impose unjustified terms on borrowers, often targeting vulnerable populations. It includes practices like excessive fees, inflated appraisals, and unnecessary refinancing.

RESPA is a federal law that requires lenders to provide borrowers with information about settlement costs, prohibits kickbacks and referral fees, and limits escrow account deposits. It applies to federally related mortgage loans.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Financing Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Financing Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing