EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateState SpecificHARD

Two neighboring farmers in Burleigh County, North Dakota both hold water appropriation permits to divert water from the same tributary for crop irrigation. Farmer Olsen received his permit in 1978, and Farmer Brandt received his permit in 2005. During a severe drought year, the tributary's flow drops to a level that can only satisfy one of the two permits in full. The North Dakota State Water Commission determines that only one farmer may divert water that season. Which of the following correctly describes the outcome under North Dakota water law?

Correct Answer

D) Farmer Olsen has priority because his 1978 permit is senior, and junior appropriators like Brandt must cease diversion first during shortages

North Dakota follows the prior appropriation doctrine, which operates on the foundational principle of 'first in time, first in right.' Farmer Olsen's 1978 permit is senior to Farmer Brandt's 2005 permit. During a shortage, the junior appropriator (Brandt) must curtail or completely cease diversion before the senior appropriator (Olsen) is affected. This means Olsen can take his full permitted amount before Brandt takes any water. This 'use it or lose it, first in right' hierarchy is what distinguishes prior appropriation from riparian or correlative rights systems, and it is directly tested on the North Dakota state exam because of the state's agricultural and energy-sector water demands.

Answer Options
A
The State Water Commission has full discretion to allocate water based on which use provides the greatest economic benefit to the county
B
Both farmers must share the available water equally, regardless of when their permits were issued
C
Farmer Brandt has priority because his 2005 permit reflects more modern agricultural practices and updated state standards
D
Farmer Olsen has priority because his 1978 permit is senior, and junior appropriators like Brandt must cease diversion first during shortages

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

water_rightsprior_appropriationseniorityshortage_allocationfirst_in_time_first_in_rightagricultural_land

Related Concepts

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

A tie-in arrangement is an illegal antitrust practice in which a seller conditions the purchase of one product or service on the buyer's agreement to purchase a separate product or service.

A trust account, also called an escrow account, is a separate bank account maintained by a broker to hold funds belonging to others, such as earnest money deposits, security deposits, or other client funds.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing