EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateFair HousingHARD

Kevin, a North Dakota broker, lists a property in Grand Forks. A prospective buyer who practices a minority religion submits a full-price offer. The seller instructs Kevin to reject the offer and tell the buyer the property is under contract, which it is not. Kevin refuses and presents the offer. The seller then directly contacts the buyer's agent and falsely claims the property is under contract. Which statement BEST describes the fair housing liability in this situation?

Correct Answer

C) Kevin may still face liability if he fails to take additional steps, such as documenting the seller's instructions and reporting the potential violation to NDREC or HUD.

Under the federal Fair Housing Act and North Dakota real estate license law, a licensee who is aware of a client's discriminatory conduct has affirmative obligations beyond simply refusing to participate. Kevin must document the seller's discriminatory instructions, inform the seller that such conduct violates federal and state law, and may be required to report the potential violation to HUD or NDREC. Merely presenting the offer is insufficient if Kevin continues the listing relationship without taking further action, as continuing to represent a seller engaged in discrimination can expose Kevin to liability under fair housing law and NDREC disciplinary rules.

Answer Options
A
Only the seller is liable for a fair housing violation because Kevin refused to participate and fulfilled his obligation by presenting the offer.
B
Kevin has no liability because he presented the offer and the seller acted independently after that point.
C
Kevin may still face liability if he fails to take additional steps, such as documenting the seller's instructions and reporting the potential violation to NDREC or HUD.
D
Neither the seller nor Kevin faces liability because the seller contacted the buyer's agent directly without Kevin's involvement.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

religionfederal_protected_classesbroker_liabilitydiscriminatory_instructionsNDREC_obligations

Related Concepts

Broker supervision is the legal obligation of a designated or managing broker to oversee and be accountable for the real estate activities of all salespersons and associate brokers operating under their license.

Commingling is the illegal act of mixing client funds with a broker's personal or business operating funds, while conversion is the unauthorized use of client funds for the broker's own benefit. Both are serious violations that can result in license revocation.

Commingling is the illegal act of mixing client trust funds with a broker's personal or business operating funds; conversion is the misappropriation of those funds.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing