EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateLicense_lawHARD

A Minnesota real estate broker, Victor, is also a licensed mortgage loan originator. During a transaction, Victor represents the seller as the listing broker AND originates the mortgage loan for the buyer without disclosing either role to the other party or obtaining written consent from both parties. The MN DOC investigates. Under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 82 and applicable Minnesota law, Victor's conduct most likely constitutes:

Correct Answer

C) A violation of Ch. 82 because Victor failed to disclose his personal interest and dual role in the transaction, creating an undisclosed conflict of interest that is a ground for disciplinary action

Under Minn. Stat. Ch. 82, a licensee who has a personal financial interest in a transaction — including earning compensation from multiple roles — must fully disclose that interest to all parties and obtain appropriate consent. Victor's undisclosed dual role as both the listing broker and the buyer's mortgage originator creates a significant, undisclosed conflict of interest. The failure to disclose and obtain written consent from both parties is an independent violation of Ch. 82, regardless of whether the individual activities are each separately licensed. This is a classic example of an undisclosed personal interest requiring disciplinary action.

Answer Options
A
A permissible dual-licensed practice in Minnesota because both activities are separately licensed and regulated, and no single statute prohibits holding both roles in the same transaction
B
A violation limited to the mortgage licensing statutes only, because Ch. 82 governs real estate brokerage and does not address mortgage origination activities
C
A violation of Ch. 82 because Victor failed to disclose his personal interest and dual role in the transaction, creating an undisclosed conflict of interest that is a ground for disciplinary action
D
A violation only if the buyer was harmed financially by the dual role, as Minnesota law requires proof of actual damages before disciplinary action may be imposed

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

conflict_of_interestdual_rolesdisclosure_requirementsdisciplinary_actionsch_82personal_interest

Related Concepts

A tie-in arrangement is an illegal antitrust practice in which a seller conditions the purchase of one product or service on the buyer's agreement to purchase a separate product or service.

A trust account, also called an escrow account, is a separate bank account maintained by a broker to hold funds belonging to others, such as earnest money deposits, security deposits, or other client funds.

Advertising regulations govern how real estate licensees may market properties and services, requiring truthful, non-deceptive advertising that includes proper identification of the brokerage.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing