EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateFair_housingHARD

A landlord in Rochester, Minnesota posts a rental advertisement stating 'ideal for married couples, no singles.' A single person who was denied the apartment files a complaint with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. Under Minn. Stat. Ch. 363A, which protected class is most directly violated by this advertisement and denial?

Correct Answer

D) Marital status, because the advertisement expressly favors married couples over unmarried individuals

Marital status is an explicitly protected class under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (Minn. Stat. Ch. 363A). The advertisement expressly states a preference for 'married couples' and excludes 'singles,' which is a direct facial discrimination based on marital status. This is a Minnesota-specific protected class not found in the federal Fair Housing Act, and this type of advertising language is a clear violation of Ch. 363A.

Answer Options
A
Age, because single people are more likely to be younger adults
B
Sex, because single people are more likely to be women
C
Familial status, because the advertisement discriminates against households without children
D
Marital status, because the advertisement expressly favors married couples over unmarried individuals

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

marital_statusdiscriminatory_advertisingminnesota_specific_protected_classrental_discrimination

Related Concepts

License requirements are the mandatory qualifications—including pre-licensing education, examination, and background checks—that a person must satisfy before legally practicing real estate. These requirements are established and enforced by each state's real estate commission.

Market allocation is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to divide markets among themselves by geographic area, property type, or price range, thereby eliminating competition.

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing