EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateState_specificMEDIUM

A property in Flint, Michigan has the following values: assessed market value of $300,000, SEV of $150,000, and taxable value of $110,000. The property is sold. What value will the taxable value reset to in the first tax year after the sale?

Correct Answer

C) $150,000, because the taxable value uncaps and resets to the SEV upon transfer

Under Michigan's Proposal A, when a property transfers ownership, the taxable value 'uncaps' and resets to the State Equalized Value (SEV) for the first tax year following the transfer. In this case, the SEV is $150,000, so the taxable value will reset from $110,000 to $150,000. This is a fundamental Michigan-specific tax concept that agents must understand and communicate to buyers, as it directly affects the buyer's ongoing tax liability.

Answer Options
A
$110,000, because the Proposal A cap continues to protect the new buyer
B
$115,500, because the taxable value increases by the maximum 5% upon transfer
C
$150,000, because the taxable value uncaps and resets to the SEV upon transfer
D
$300,000, because the taxable value resets to the full assessed market value upon transfer

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

proposal_ataxable_value_uncappingSEVtransfer_of_ownershipmichigan_specific

Related Concepts

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

A tie-in arrangement is an illegal antitrust practice in which a seller conditions the purchase of one product or service on the buyer's agreement to purchase a separate product or service.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing