EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateFair HousingEASY

A landlord in Springfield, Massachusetts refuses to rent an apartment to a decorated Army veteran, stating that he prefers tenants without military backgrounds. Under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 151B, this landlord's conduct is most likely:

Correct Answer

D) Unlawful, because military/veteran status is a protected class under Massachusetts Chapter 151B.

Under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 151B, military/veteran status is a protected class in housing. The landlord's refusal to rent based on the applicant's military background constitutes unlawful discrimination under Massachusetts state law, regardless of whether federal law provides similar protection.

Answer Options
A
Lawful, because military status is not a protected class under any Massachusetts housing law.
B
Unlawful, but only if the veteran can prove intentional discrimination under federal law.
C
Lawful, because the federal Fair Housing Act does not protect military veterans.
D
Unlawful, because military/veteran status is a protected class under Massachusetts Chapter 151B.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

chapter_151bmilitary_veteran_statusprotected_classeslandlord_discrimination

Related Concepts

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

A tie-in arrangement is an illegal antitrust practice in which a seller conditions the purchase of one product or service on the buyer's agreement to purchase a separate product or service.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing