EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateFair_housingHARD

A condominium association in New Orleans has a rule prohibiting any resident from having more than one occupant per bedroom, citing fire safety concerns. A family of four — two parents and two children — applies to rent a two-bedroom unit. The association denies the application, citing the occupancy standard. A fair housing complaint is filed. Under Louisiana law, which of the following most accurately describes the legal analysis?

Correct Answer

A) The association's rule may violate familial status protections if it is more restrictive than the HUD two-persons-per-bedroom guideline and is not justified by legitimate factors.

Under both the federal Fair Housing Act and Louisiana's Equal Housing Opportunity Act (La. R.S. 51:2606), occupancy standards that are more restrictive than HUD's general guideline of two persons per bedroom may constitute illegal familial status discrimination unless justified by legitimate factors such as the actual size of the unit, configuration, health and safety codes, or other objective criteria. A blanket one-person-per-bedroom rule applied to a two-bedroom unit would prevent a family of four from renting, which disproportionately impacts families with children and may not be justified by actual safety concerns. The association's rule is subject to fair housing scrutiny.

Answer Options
A
The association's rule may violate familial status protections if it is more restrictive than the HUD two-persons-per-bedroom guideline and is not justified by legitimate factors.
B
The family must prove intentional discrimination before the association's occupancy policy can be challenged under Louisiana fair housing law.
C
The association's rule is automatically valid because occupancy standards based on safety are always exempt from fair housing laws.
D
The association's rule is valid under Louisiana law because condominium associations are exempt from the Louisiana Equal Housing Opportunity Act.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

familial_statusoccupancy_standardscondo_associationdisparate_impactfair_housing

Related Concepts

License requirements are the mandatory qualifications—including pre-licensing education, examination, and background checks—that a person must satisfy before legally practicing real estate. These requirements are established and enforced by each state's real estate commission.

Market allocation is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to divide markets among themselves by geographic area, property type, or price range, thereby eliminating competition.

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing