EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateLicense_lawHARD

Salesperson Rachel works for Broker Mike in Kansas. Rachel lists a property for seller Garcia and subsequently procures a buyer, Chen, who wants to purchase the same property. Rachel proposes to represent both Garcia and Chen in the transaction without disclosing this arrangement to either party. Under Kansas law and BRRETA, which of the following most accurately describes the legal status of Rachel's proposed conduct?

Correct Answer

A) Rachel's conduct violates BRRETA because undisclosed dual representation is prohibited, and written consent from both parties is required before any dual or designated agency arrangement may proceed

Under BRRETA (K.S.A. 58-30,101 et seq.), a licensee may not represent both the buyer and seller in a transaction without the written informed consent of both parties. Undisclosed dual representation is a violation of Kansas agency law. Any dual agency or designated agency arrangement requires written disclosure and consent. Rachel's proposal to represent both parties without disclosure to either is a direct violation of BRRETA and subjects her and Broker Mike to KREC disciplinary action.

Answer Options
A
Rachel's conduct violates BRRETA because undisclosed dual representation is prohibited, and written consent from both parties is required before any dual or designated agency arrangement may proceed
B
Rachel's conduct is permissible because Kansas law allows salespersons to represent both parties as long as the broker is aware of the arrangement
C
Rachel's conduct is permissible because under BRRETA, the default transaction broker status automatically applies whenever a salesperson works with both parties, eliminating any disclosure requirement
D
Rachel's conduct is permissible if she immediately converts to transaction broker status without notifying either party, as transaction brokerage requires no written disclosure in Kansas

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

dual_agencybrretadisclosurewritten_consentagency_relationships

Related Concepts

License requirements are the mandatory qualifications—including pre-licensing education, examination, and background checks—that a person must satisfy before legally practicing real estate. These requirements are established and enforced by each state's real estate commission.

Market allocation is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to divide markets among themselves by geographic area, property type, or price range, thereby eliminating competition.

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing