EstatePass
ContractsAttorney_review_periodMEDIUM

A residential purchase contract in Illinois is signed on Monday at 3:00 PM. The standard 5-business-day attorney review period begins on the date of acceptance, with the acceptance date counted as day zero. If no attorney modifications or disapprovals are delivered, when does the attorney review period expire?

Correct Answer

A) The following Monday at the end of the day

The Illinois standard residential contract provides a 5-business-day attorney review period beginning on the date of acceptance (counted as day zero). Counting Tuesday through the following Monday yields five business days, so the period expires at the end of that following Monday.

Answer Options
A
The following Monday at the end of the day
B
Thursday at 3:00 PM
C
Friday at 5:00 PM
D
The following Tuesday at the end of the day

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

attorney_reviewtimelinebusiness_days

Related Concepts

The Statute of Frauds is a legal requirement that certain types of contracts must be in writing and signed to be enforceable. In real estate, all contracts for the sale of land or interests in land must be in writing.

A time is of the essence clause in a contract means that all deadlines and dates specified in the agreement are strictly enforceable, and failure to meet them constitutes a material breach.

An appraisal contingency allows the buyer to cancel or renegotiate the contract if the property's appraised value comes in lower than the agreed-upon purchase price. This contingency protects buyers from overpaying.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

A contract where one party uses threats to force the other party to sign is considered:

Kevin and Lisa are purchasing a home in Bellevue. Their purchase and sale agreement includes both a financing contingency and an inspection contingency. The inspection reveals significant foundation issues. Kevin and Lisa request a $15,000 price reduction. The seller counters with a $5,000 reduction. Kevin and Lisa reject the counter and invoke the inspection contingency to terminate the contract. The seller argues the buyers are in breach because they should have used the financing contingency instead. Which statement is most accurate under Washington law?

Kevin and Amy are purchasing a commercial property in Worcester, Massachusetts. Their broker recommends including a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment contingency in the purchase and sale agreement. The seller argues this contingency is only relevant for industrial properties. Under Massachusetts law, why is the broker's recommendation valid for this commercial property?

Sandra agreed to sell her Fairfax County home to David for $575,000. After all contingencies were removed, Sandra received a higher offer and refused to convey the property. David wants to force Sandra to sell him the home at the agreed price. Which remedy should David pursue in Virginia court?

After a property inspection reveals minor cosmetic issues, the buyer demands $20,000 in credits. The seller refuses, and the inspection contingency deadline passes without the buyer formally canceling. What is the likely result?

People Also Study

Related Articles

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing