EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateFair_housingHARD

James is a buyer's agent in Iowa. His buyer client, who is gay, was refused a showing by a listing agent who stated the seller 'prefers not to deal with that type of person.' James advises his client that this refusal may violate Iowa law. A colleague argues that because the federal Fair Housing Act does not explicitly list sexual orientation, no federal or state violation has occurred. Which of the following best explains the correct legal position under Iowa law?

Correct Answer

D) James is correct because Iowa Code Chapter 216 independently prohibits housing discrimination based on sexual orientation, regardless of federal law

Iowa Code Chapter 216 independently prohibits housing discrimination based on sexual orientation. States may enact fair housing laws that provide greater protections than federal law. Iowa's Civil Rights Act is a separate and independent legal basis for a discrimination claim, and a violation of Chapter 216 does not require a simultaneous violation of the federal Fair Housing Act. James is therefore correct in advising his client.

Answer Options
A
The colleague is correct because Iowa must follow federal fair housing standards and cannot add protected classes beyond federal law
B
James is correct only if the buyer can prove the refusal was also based on race or another federally protected class
C
The colleague is correct because sexual orientation is only protected in Iowa employment law, not housing law
D
James is correct because Iowa Code Chapter 216 independently prohibits housing discrimination based on sexual orientation, regardless of federal law

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

iowa_civil_rights_actsexual_orientationprotected_classesfederal_vs_statefair_housingdiscrimination

Related Concepts

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

A tie-in arrangement is an illegal antitrust practice in which a seller conditions the purchase of one product or service on the buyer's agreement to purchase a separate product or service.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing