A Georgia landlord wants to implement a 'no children' policy for their apartment complex. Under federal Fair Housing Act provisions enforced in Georgia, which statement is NOT accurate regarding this policy?

Correct Answer

A) The policy is permissible if applied consistently to all prospective tenants

Correct: A - The policy is permissible if applied consistently to all prospective tenants. This statement is NOT accurate because a 'no children' policy violates federal Fair Housing Act protections for familial status, regardless of consistent application. Why not B: This option is incorrect because "Violations could result in both federal and state enforcement actions" does not match the rule tested by the question. The correct answer is "The policy is permissible if applied consistently to all prospective tenants". This statement is NOT accurate because a 'no children' policy violates federal Fair Housing Act protections for familial status, regardless of consistent application. Why not C: This option is incorrect because "The policy would violate familial status protections under federal law" does not match the rule tested by the question. The correct answer is "The policy is permissible if applied consistently to all prospective tenants". This statement is NOT accurate because a 'no children' policy violates federal Fair Housing Act protections for familial status, regardless of consistent application. Why not D: This option is incorrect because "Georgia licensees cannot assist in implementing such discriminatory policies" does not match the rule tested by the question. The correct answer is "The policy is permissible if applied consistently to all prospective tenants". This statement is NOT accurate because a 'no children' policy violates federal Fair Housing Act protections for familial status, regardless of consistent application.