EstatePass
SpdsSpds_form_and_purposeMEDIUM

Using the current Arizona SPDS, in a Queen Creek transaction review, an investor seller never lived in the property and asks whether the SPDS should pretend the seller knows nothing about the property at all. Which outcome best matches current Arizona practice?

Correct Answer

C) a seller with limited personal occupancy still answers the SPDS based on the seller's actual knowledge, should not use non-occupancy as an excuse to conceal known facts

Under current AAR SPDS; Arizona disclosure practice, a seller with limited personal occupancy still answers the SPDS based on the seller's actual knowledge and should not use non-occupancy as an excuse to conceal known facts.

Answer Options
A
a seller may always answer 'no knowledge' to every item if the seller rented the property
B
non-occupant sellers must have the tenant complete the SPDS instead in that Arizona transaction
C
a seller with limited personal occupancy still answers the SPDS based on the seller's actual knowledge, should not use non-occupancy as an excuse to conceal known facts
D
an investor seller never has to disclose anything beyond the price under current Arizona law

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Spds Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Spds

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Spds

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Spds Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

arizona_specificspdslimited_knowledgespds_form_and_purpose
Was this explanation helpful?

More Spds Questions

People Also Study

Spds Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing