EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateFair HousingMEDIUM

A property manager in Phoenix receives two rental applications on the same day for a two-bedroom apartment. The first applicant is a single mother with two children who meets all income and credit requirements. The second applicant is a married couple with no children who also meets all requirements. The property manager chooses the married couple, stating 'families with children cause more wear and tear.' Under the Arizona Fair Housing Act, what violation has occurred?

Correct Answer

B) Discrimination based on familial status

This is discrimination based on familial status, which is prohibited under the Arizona Fair Housing Act. The property manager's decision was based on the presence of children and stereotypical assumptions about families with children. Why not A: Property managers cannot use stereotypical assumptions about families with children as a basis for rental decisions. Why not C: While marital status may be involved, the primary issue is the discrimination against the applicant because she has children (familial status). Why not D: Equal treatment during the application process doesn't excuse discriminatory decision-making based on protected characteristics.

Answer Options
A
No violation, as property managers can consider potential property damage
B
Discrimination based on familial status
C
Discrimination based on marital status only
D
No violation if both applicants were treated equally during the application process

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

familial_statusrental_discriminationproperty_managementprotected_class

Related Concepts

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

A tie-in arrangement is an illegal antitrust practice in which a seller conditions the purchase of one product or service on the buyer's agreement to purchase a separate product or service.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing