EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateState_specificMEDIUM

Sandra owns a 1/2-acre lot within the city limits of Fayetteville, Arkansas, where she has lived for ten years. A judgment creditor seeks to force a sale of the property to satisfy a $40,000 unsecured debt. Sandra claims the homestead exemption. Which of the following most accurately describes the legal outcome under Arkansas law?

Correct Answer

B) Only 1/4 acre of the lot is protected by the homestead exemption; the creditor may reach the remaining 1/4 acre.

Under Ark. Const. Art. 9, §§ 3–6, the urban homestead exemption is limited to 1/4 acre. When a property exceeds the applicable acreage limit, only the portion up to the limit is protected. Sandra's 1/2-acre lot is within city limits, so 1/4 acre is shielded from the creditor, but the remaining 1/4 acre is not protected and may be subject to the creditor's claim.

Answer Options
A
The entire 1/2-acre lot is protected because the homestead exemption covers the full property regardless of size.
B
Only 1/4 acre of the lot is protected by the homestead exemption; the creditor may reach the remaining 1/4 acre.
C
The homestead exemption does not apply because the lot exceeds the urban 1/4-acre limit.
D
The homestead exemption protects up to 80 acres because Sandra has lived there for more than five years.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

homestead_exemptionurban_acreagepartial_protectioncreditor_protection

Related Concepts

Broker supervision is the legal obligation of a designated or managing broker to oversee and be accountable for the real estate activities of all salespersons and associate brokers operating under their license.

Commingling is the illegal act of mixing client funds with a broker's personal or business operating funds, while conversion is the unauthorized use of client funds for the broker's own benefit. Both are serious violations that can result in license revocation.

Commingling is the illegal act of mixing client trust funds with a broker's personal or business operating funds; conversion is the misappropriation of those funds.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing