A team member spots what may be a fabricated comparable and raises it with the originator, who explains it away. She accepts the explanation and closes the file. What should she have done instead?
Correct Answer
C) Escalate the red flag through compliance channels
Why this is correct: Fraud detection is a critical component of loan origination. When a red flag (e.g., inconsistent documentation, altered pay stubs, mismatched signatures) is identified, the file must be paused. SAFE Act standards and lender policies require that such indicators be investigated and escalated through proper compliance or fraud investigation channels before the loan can proceed. This protects the lender and upholds industry integrity. Why the other choices are wrong: The choice "Continue the activity because the borrower appears willing to proceed" is wrong because willingness does not negate potential fraud. The choice "Ignore the consumer-protection issue unless the borrower complains" is wrong because fraud detection is a proactive duty. The choice "Assume the Fraud Detection condition is met because the borrower satisfied the separate TRID timing requirement" is wrong because compliance with one rule (TRID timing) does not satisfy a completely different requirement (fraud review). Exam tip: When you see a fraud red flag, stop and escalate. Never assume it will resolve itself or that other compliance steps cover it.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
The correct response is "Escalate the red flag through compliance channels" because Fraud red flags require verification, documentation, and escalation before reliance.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Continue the activity because the borrower appears willing to proceed.
Continue the activity because the borrower appears willing to proceed. is not correct because it does not apply the rule tested by this file scenario.
Option B: Ignore the consumer-protection issue unless the borrower complains.
Ignore the consumer-protection issue unless the borrower complains. is not correct because it does not apply the rule tested by this file scenario.
Option D: Assume the Fraud Detection condition is met because the borrower satisfied the separate TRID timing requirement.
This distractor shifts the issue to a different trigger, product, or timing rule instead of applying the rule tested in the stem.
Memory Technique
fraud red flags: identify the rule being tested, then choose the action that documents or applies that rule before the file moves forward.
Exam Tip
Match the file facts to fraud red flags; do not choose an exception or shortcut that skips the required rule.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Choosing an internal exception instead of the governing rule
- -Treating preliminary or informal facts as a substitute for required documentation
- -Answering from a familiar but unrelated mortgage topic
More Ethics & Fraud Questions
In a closing-readiness check, a disclosure specialist sees facts tied to Appraisal Fraud Detection. What should the file reflect?
An MLO recommends a loan with a low initial payment that will increase sharply in two years. The borrower says retirement income will be fixed and asks whether the payment can change. What is the appropriate response?
An MLO alters a bank statement to make the applicant's account balance appear higher and submits it to underwriting. Which response is appropriate?
A branch manager asks about a loan file because marketing proposes a rate the company is not prepared to offer. What should happen?
A borrower wants cash for necessary home repairs. A proposed refinance provides $15,000 cash but adds $12,000 in costs and extends repayment by 15 years. What is the best next step for the MLO?
Before closing, the team discovers that an ad shows an interest rate but omits the APR presentation. What is the safest compliant answer?
The loan team is resolving Privacy and Confidentiality during a quality-control sample. Which action best fits the rule?
A house last sold for $185,000 in January. In March it changes hands 3 times in 9 days, reaching $410,000, with the same appraiser and the same closing agent on every leg. Assuming the parties colluded to inflate appraisals without improvements to support the higher prices, what fraud scheme does this pattern illustrate?
For closings involving federally related mortgage loans, a title company pays a real estate brokerage $75 for each referred client who closes. The brokerage only passes along the client’s name and number. Does this referral payment comply with RESPA Section 8?
Before closing, the team discovers that a loan officer wants different terms because of a protected applicant characteristic. What is the safest compliant answer?
People Also Study
Federal Mortgage-Related Laws
24% of exam
General Mortgage Knowledge
20% of exam
Mortgage Loan Origination Activities
27% of exam
Uniform State Test Content
11% of exam
Related Study Resources
Previous Question
A quality-control reviewer flags a case because a loan officer wants different terms because of a protected applicant characteristic. What correction is appropriate?
Next Question
For a consumer loan secured by the borrower’s principal dwelling, a lender obtains independent valuations of $505,000 and $530,000. Documented analysis supports the $530,000 valuation as more reliable, rather than simply desirable for approval. Under the valuation-independence rule, may the lender select it?