EstatePass
Ethics & Fraudmedium18% of exam

An MLO alters a bank statement to make the applicant's account balance appear higher and submits it to underwriting. Which response is appropriate?

Correct Answer

B) Treat the alteration as potential mortgage fraud and escalate it under company procedures

Why this is correct: Submitting altered or falsified documents to underwriting is a serious form of mortgage fraud. It involves a material misrepresentation intended to influence the credit decision. The governing ethical and legal principle requires MLOs to act with integrity and report suspected fraud. The correct answer, "Treat the alteration as potential mortgage fraud and escalate it under company procedures," mandates the proper response: stop the process and follow internal compliance protocols for investigation. Why the other choices are wrong: "Proceed if the borrower expects a deposit" is wrong because an expected future deposit does not justify presenting a falsified current bank statement. "Correct it only after closing" is wrong because closing on a loan based on known false documentation is illegal. "Ignore it because assets are not part of a loan application" is wrong; assets are a standard part of the application and are verified for ATR and qualification. Exam tip: Any alteration of a document is a huge red flag. The only acceptable action is to stop and escalate—never proceed or hide it.

Answer Options
A
Proceed if the borrower expects a deposit
B
Treat the alteration as potential mortgage fraud and escalate it under company procedures
C
Correct it only after closing
D
Ignore it because assets are not part of a loan application

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Why this is correct: Submitting altered or falsified documents to underwriting is a serious form of mortgage fraud. It involves a material misrepresentation intended to influence the credit decision. The governing ethical and legal principle requires MLOs to act with integrity and report suspected fraud. The correct answer, "Treat the alteration as potential mortgage fraud and escalate it under company procedures," mandates the proper response: stop the process and follow internal compliance protocols for investigation. Why the other choices are wrong: "Proceed if the borrower expects a deposit" is wrong because an expected future deposit does not justify presenting a falsified current bank statement. "Correct it only after closing" is wrong because closing on a loan based on known false documentation is illegal. "Ignore it because assets are not part of a loan application" is wrong; assets are a standard part of the application and are verified for ATR and qualification. Exam tip: Any alteration of a document is a huge red flag. The only acceptable action is to stop and escalate—never proceed or hide it.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Ethics & Fraud Questions

In a closing-readiness check, a disclosure specialist sees facts tied to Appraisal Fraud Detection. What should the file reflect?

An MLO recommends a loan with a low initial payment that will increase sharply in two years. The borrower says retirement income will be fixed and asks whether the payment can change. What is the appropriate response?

A branch manager asks about a loan file because marketing proposes a rate the company is not prepared to offer. What should happen?

A borrower wants cash for necessary home repairs. A proposed refinance provides $15,000 cash but adds $12,000 in costs and extends repayment by 15 years. What is the best next step for the MLO?

Before closing, the team discovers that an ad shows an interest rate but omits the APR presentation. What is the safest compliant answer?

The loan team is resolving Privacy and Confidentiality during a quality-control sample. Which action best fits the rule?

A house last sold for $185,000 in January. In March it changes hands 3 times in 9 days, reaching $410,000, with the same appraiser and the same closing agent on every leg. Assuming the parties colluded to inflate appraisals without improvements to support the higher prices, what fraud scheme does this pattern illustrate?

For closings involving federally related mortgage loans, a title company pays a real estate brokerage $75 for each referred client who closes. The brokerage only passes along the client’s name and number. Does this referral payment comply with RESPA Section 8?

Before closing, the team discovers that a loan officer wants different terms because of a protected applicant characteristic. What is the safest compliant answer?

A borrower-facing employee is unsure what to do when marketing proposes a rate the company is not prepared to offer. What is the correct response?

People Also Study

Related Study Resources

Practice More MLO Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your SAFE MLO exam.

Start Practicing