EstatePass
Originationmedium27% of exam

A broker regularly does business with five creditors but obtains and reviews loan options from only one. She presents three loans from that creditor. Has she satisfied the creditor-comparison condition of Regulation Z's anti-steering safe harbor?

Correct Answer

D) No: she must obtain and review options from at least three of her regular creditors

D. Reviewing offers from only one of five regular creditors does not satisfy this safe-harbor condition. The commentary defines the relevant significant number as at least three regular creditors when that many are available. Reviewing the market and presenting options are separate steps: three offers from one creditor cannot replace the required review. Scope and exceptions: Failure to meet a safe harbor does not alone prove prohibited steering. An originator with fewer than three regular creditors considers all of them. Source: 1026.36(e)(2)–(4), comment 36(e)(3)-1 — https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1026/36/

Answer Options
A
Yes: using one creditor is sufficient whenever its rates look competitive
B
No: all presented loans must always be from different creditors
C
Yes: presenting any three loans alone satisfies that condition
D
No: she must obtain and review options from at least three of her regular creditors

Why This Is the Correct Answer

D. Reviewing offers from only one of five regular creditors does not satisfy this safe-harbor condition. The commentary defines the relevant significant number as at least three regular creditors when that many are available. Reviewing the market and presenting options are separate steps: three offers from one creditor cannot replace the required review. Scope and exceptions: Failure to meet a safe harbor does not alone prove prohibited steering. An originator with fewer than three regular creditors considers all of them.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: Yes: using one creditor is sufficient whenever its rates look competitive

A competitive offer does not cure insufficient creditor review.

Option B: No: all presented loans must always be from different creditors

This confuses the creditors reviewed with the loans presented. Comment 36(e)(3)-1 permits qualifying loans presented to the consumer to come from a single creditor after the required creditor review; the presented loans need not all come from different creditors.

Option C: Yes: presenting any three loans alone satisfies that condition

The safe harbor specifies both the creditor pool and qualifying option criteria.

Exam Tip

Count creditors reviewed separately from loans presented.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Origination Questions

Before the team acts on a servicing handoff check, a closing coordinator must address Asset Verification and Reserves. Which response is most defensible?

An MLO is reviewing procedures for a case where a cost changes after the Closing Disclosure has already been provided. What is the proper handling?

During a post-application update, a quality-control reviewer encounters a Credit Analysis and Evaluation issue. Which response should avoid a shortcut that would misapply the rule?

A construction-to-permanent loan will disburse in 5 draws over 11 months before the permanent phase begins. Which Regulation Z appendix provides a disclosure method for multiple-advance construction transactions?

Before closing, the team discovers that a borrower asks which upfront charge can be collected before intent to proceed. What is the safest compliant answer?

A construction loan agreement allows advances only after documented completion of specified work. A builder requests the next draw, but no completion evidence has been provided. What should occur?

Before releasing the final construction draw, which combination most directly supports project completion and clear collateral?

A construction-to-permanent loan will convert to a substantially higher fully amortizing payment. Which payment is especially important when assessing the borrower's long-term repayment capacity?

A construction-to-permanent note states that conversion requires completion, a certificate of occupancy, and no unresolved liens. Construction is finished, but a mechanic's lien remains. What should happen?

A branch manager asks about a loan file because a processor wants to omit known monthly obligations from underwriting. What should happen?

People Also Study

Related Study Resources

Practice More MLO Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your SAFE MLO exam.

Start Practicing