EstatePass
Federal Lawsmedium24% of exam

On 12 August a lender decides to share borrower information with an unaffiliated marketing company. Its privacy notice describes the sharing and offers an opt-out. Assuming this sharing is subject to GLBA's opt-out requirement and no exception applies, what opportunity must the lender provide before sharing?

Correct Answer

B) Provide a reasonable opportunity to opt out before disclosing the information

B. A reasonable opt-out opportunity must precede disclosure. The initial notice and opt-out notice are separate prerequisites from the opportunity to act. With no exception, disclosure also requires that the consumer has not opted out. Notice alone does not authorize immediate sharing. Scope and exceptions: The regulation supplies different reasonable-opportunity examples, including specified 30-day mail and electronic scenarios and an isolated-transaction example. Do not invent one universal deadline from the lender’s August 12 decision. Other restrictions and exceptions require separate analysis. Source: Section 1016.10(a)(1)–(3) — https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1016/10/

Answer Options
A
It may share at once, since the notice describes what will happen
B
Provide a reasonable opportunity to opt out before disclosing the information
C
It may share where the borrower does not object within 3 business days
D
It may never share with an unaffiliated party whatever the notice says

Why This Is the Correct Answer

B. A reasonable opt-out opportunity must precede disclosure. The initial notice and opt-out notice are separate prerequisites from the opportunity to act. With no exception, disclosure also requires that the consumer has not opted out. Notice alone does not authorize immediate sharing. Scope and exceptions: The regulation supplies different reasonable-opportunity examples, including specified 30-day mail and electronic scenarios and an isolated-transaction example. Do not invent one universal deadline from the lender’s August 12 decision. Other restrictions and exceptions require separate analysis.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: It may share at once, since the notice describes what will happen

It omits the opportunity to act before disclosure.

Option C: It may share where the borrower does not object within 3 business days

Three business days is not the rule’s general safe waiting period.

Option D: It may never share with an unaffiliated party whatever the notice says

The rule conditionally permits sharing; it is not an absolute ban.

Exam Tip

Notice, opportunity and no opt-out are distinct conditions—not interchangeable steps.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Federal Laws Questions

People Also Study

Related Study Resources

Practice More MLO Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your SAFE MLO exam.

Start Practicing