EstatePass
Federal Lawsmedium24% of exam

In a covered closed-end consumer mortgage secured by a dwelling, the consumer directly pays a mortgage broker organization a 1% origination fee. The wholesale creditor also pays that same organization 0.75% as origination compensation for the same transaction. Does this comply with the dual-compensation rule?

Correct Answer

C) No: the creditor cannot also compensate the broker organization that receives direct consumer compensation in this transaction

C. These two payments constitute prohibited dual compensation. The test turns on sources of origination compensation, not just the combined percentage. Identifying both amounts on a disclosure does not create an exception. Scope and exceptions: A consumer-paid broker organization may compensate its individual originator subject to the applicable requirements. A creditor may also provide consumer-benefit funds used solely for other transaction costs. Neither exception permits the creditor payment described here. Source: Section 1026.36(d)(2)(i)(A)–(C); comment 36(d)(2)(i)-1 — https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1026/36/

Answer Options
A
Permitted where both payments appear on the Closing Disclosure
B
Prohibited only where the combined payment exceeds the market rate
C
No: the creditor cannot also compensate the broker organization that receives direct consumer compensation in this transaction
D
Permitted where the 2 payments together stay under 3% of the loan

Why This Is the Correct Answer

C. These two payments constitute prohibited dual compensation. The test turns on sources of origination compensation, not just the combined percentage. Identifying both amounts on a disclosure does not create an exception. Scope and exceptions: A consumer-paid broker organization may compensate its individual originator subject to the applicable requirements. A creditor may also provide consumer-benefit funds used solely for other transaction costs. Neither exception permits the creditor payment described here.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: Permitted where both payments appear on the Closing Disclosure

Disclosure does not legalize a prohibited payment arrangement.

Option B: Prohibited only where the combined payment exceeds the market rate

A market-rate comparison does not resolve the dual-payment prohibition.

Option D: Permitted where the 2 payments together stay under 3% of the loan

A 3% combined cap is not this rule's test.

Exam Tip

Separate prohibited second-source compensation from permitted internal compensation and other closing-cost credits.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Federal Laws Questions

People Also Study

Related Study Resources

Practice More MLO Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your SAFE MLO exam.

Start Practicing