EstatePass
Federal Lawsmedium24% of exam

A lender plans to share nonpublic personal information with unaffiliated marketers outside any Regulation P exception. It mails the required privacy and opt-out notices with a reasonable opt-out method. Which example does Regulation P expressly recognize as a reasonable opportunity to opt out?

Correct Answer

C) Allowing 30 days from mailing for the consumer to respond before disclosure

C. Allowing 30 days from mailing is the expressly stated example. Non-exempt sharing with unaffiliated marketers requires an opt-out opportunity before disclosure. The question asks for the example applicable to mailed notices, not a universal deadline for all privacy situations. Scope and exceptions: Different delivery contexts and regulatory exceptions need separate analysis. Do not teach 30 days as a universal rule for every method. Source: 12 CFR 1016.10(a)(1), (a)(3)(i) — https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1016/10/

Answer Options
A
Beginning disclosure upon mailing and allowing 30 days to stop future sharing
B
Waiting for the next annual privacy notice before accepting an opt-out request
C
Allowing 30 days from mailing for the consumer to respond before disclosure
D
Obtaining affirmative written consent from every consumer instead of offering an opt-out

Why This Is the Correct Answer

C. Allowing 30 days from mailing is the expressly stated example. Non-exempt sharing with unaffiliated marketers requires an opt-out opportunity before disclosure. The question asks for the example applicable to mailed notices, not a universal deadline for all privacy situations. Scope and exceptions: Different delivery contexts and regulatory exceptions need separate analysis. Do not teach 30 days as a universal rule for every method.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: Beginning disclosure upon mailing and allowing 30 days to stop future sharing

Sharing immediately reverses the required order: opportunity first, disclosure afterward.

Option B: Waiting for the next annual privacy notice before accepting an opt-out request

An annual notice is not a reason to defer accepting an opt-out.

Option D: Obtaining affirmative written consent from every consumer instead of offering an opt-out

Affirmative written consent is not the specified opt-out example.

Exam Tip

Recognize when a regulation supplies an example rather than a single universal deadline.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Federal Laws Questions

People Also Study

Related Study Resources

Practice More MLO Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your SAFE MLO exam.

Start Practicing