EstatePass
Ethics & Fraudmedium18% of exam

A lender tells an 81-year-old applicant that eligibility for an FHA-insured HECM is conditioned on buying an annuity from its sales partner with the loan proceeds. Is that condition permitted?

Correct Answer

B) No; an annuity purchase cannot be required as a condition of HECM insurance eligibility

B. The lender cannot impose the annuity purchase as a condition of obtaining the HECM. The condition links access to HECM insurance to purchase of a separate investment product. HUD’s March 2026 counseling handbook identifies the prohibition in 12 U.S.C. 1715z-20(o). Requiring purchase through a sales partner does not turn the condition into a voluntary use of proceeds. Scope and exceptions: The statutory exception concerns customary mortgage-related items such as title, hazard and flood insurance; it does not cover the investment annuity described here. Voluntary investment choices must be distinguished from lender-imposed eligibility conditions. Source: Handbook 7610.1 (03/2026), HECM counseling, II.B.3 Objectivity, with No Conflicts of Interest; PDF page 89 — https://www.hud.gov/sites/default/files/hudclips/documents/76101HSGHBK.pdf

Answer Options
A
Yes; a signed acknowledgment waives the restriction
B
No; an annuity purchase cannot be required as a condition of HECM insurance eligibility
C
No, but only if the annuity commission exceeds 5%
D
Yes; the borrower can use HECM proceeds for investments

Why This Is the Correct Answer

B. The lender cannot impose the annuity purchase as a condition of obtaining the HECM. The condition links access to HECM insurance to purchase of a separate investment product. HUD’s March 2026 counseling handbook identifies the prohibition in 12 U.S.C. 1715z-20(o). Requiring purchase through a sales partner does not turn the condition into a voluntary use of proceeds. Scope and exceptions: The statutory exception concerns customary mortgage-related items such as title, hazard and flood insurance; it does not cover the investment annuity described here. Voluntary investment choices must be distinguished from lender-imposed eligibility conditions.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: Yes; a signed acknowledgment waives the restriction

An acknowledgment records consent; it does not remove the prohibited condition.

Option C: No, but only if the annuity commission exceeds 5%

The described prohibition is not limited to commissions exceeding 5%.

Option D: Yes; the borrower can use HECM proceeds for investments

A voluntary use of proceeds is different from a lender-imposed eligibility condition.

Exam Tip

Borrower choice and required cross-selling are different questions.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Ethics & Fraud Questions

In a closing-readiness check, a disclosure specialist sees facts tied to Appraisal Fraud Detection. What should the file reflect?

An MLO recommends a loan with a low initial payment that will increase sharply in two years. The borrower says retirement income will be fixed and asks whether the payment can change. What is the appropriate response?

An MLO alters a bank statement to make the applicant's account balance appear higher and submits it to underwriting. Which response is appropriate?

A branch manager asks about a loan file because marketing proposes a rate the company is not prepared to offer. What should happen?

A borrower wants cash for necessary home repairs. A proposed refinance provides $15,000 cash but adds $12,000 in costs and extends repayment by 15 years. What is the best next step for the MLO?

Before closing, the team discovers that an ad shows an interest rate but omits the APR presentation. What is the safest compliant answer?

The loan team is resolving Privacy and Confidentiality during a quality-control sample. Which action best fits the rule?

A house last sold for $185,000 in January. In March it changes hands 3 times in 9 days, reaching $410,000, with the same appraiser and the same closing agent on every leg. Assuming the parties colluded to inflate appraisals without improvements to support the higher prices, what fraud scheme does this pattern illustrate?

For closings involving federally related mortgage loans, a title company pays a real estate brokerage $75 for each referred client who closes. The brokerage only passes along the client’s name and number. Does this referral payment comply with RESPA Section 8?

Before closing, the team discovers that a loan officer wants different terms because of a protected applicant characteristic. What is the safest compliant answer?

People Also Study

Related Study Resources

Practice More MLO Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your SAFE MLO exam.

Start Practicing