A landlord in Ohio is served with an OCRC complaint notification. The landlord must respond to the complaint within the deadline set by the OCRC. Failure to respond will MOST likely result in:
Correct Answer
A) The OCRC proceeding with its investigation based on the available evidence, which may result in adverse findings
If the respondent fails to respond to the OCRC complaint, the Commission will proceed with its investigation based on the available evidence. Without the respondent's participation, the investigation may rely solely on the complainant's evidence, which could result in findings adverse to the respondent.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Deep Analysis of This Oh Fair Housing Question
Background Knowledge for Oh Fair Housing
Real World Application in Oh Fair Housing
Common Mistakes to Avoid on Oh Fair Housing Questions
Related Topics & Key Terms
Key Terms:
Related Concepts
A group boycott is an illegal antitrust practice in which two or more competing real estate businesses agree to refuse to work with a specific person, company, or entity in order to harm that party's ability to compete.
In real estate, the distinction between an independent contractor and an employee determines tax treatment, liability, and the level of control a broker may exercise over the agent's daily activities. Most real estate agents operate as independent contractors.
Florida real estate licenses must be renewed biennially, and sales associates have specific post-license education requirements for their first renewal.
More Oh Fair Housing Questions
An Ohio tenant believes they were denied housing based on their disability but is unsure where to file a complaint. The tenant's BEST first step is to:
After a housing discrimination complaint is filed with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission, the OCRC's first step in the process is typically to:
A tenant in Columbus, Ohio files a housing discrimination complaint with the OCRC alleging that their landlord refused to renew their lease because of their race. The OCRC investigates and finds no probable cause. What is the tenant's remaining option?
Which of the following individuals may file a housing discrimination complaint with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission?
Under Ohio law, a person who witnesses housing discrimination against another person can:
- → The correct sequence of steps in the OCRC housing discrimination complaint process is:
- → Under Ohio fair housing law, which entity has the authority to conduct fair housing testing (sending testers to determine if discriminatory practices are occurring)?
- → Under Ohio law, a real estate licensee who is found to have engaged in housing discrimination may face discipline from the Superintendent of Real Estate. Which of the following is a ground for disciplinary action under ORC 4735?
- → A prospective tenant in Ohio is denied housing and believes the denial was discriminatory. The tenant wants to file a complaint but does not have money for an attorney. Under Ohio law, the tenant can:
- → Under Ohio fair housing law, retaliation against a person who files a fair housing complaint is:
- → Under Ohio fair housing enforcement, the term 'conciliation' in the OCRC complaint process refers to:
- → A complainant in an Ohio housing discrimination case prevails at the OCRC hearing. The OCRC awards $25,000 in compensatory damages. The respondent refuses to pay. Under Ohio law, the OCRC's order can be enforced by:
- → A fair housing organization in Ohio conducts testing and discovers that a large apartment complex consistently offers different rental terms to applicants of different races. The organization wants to file a complaint. Under Ohio law, does a fair housing organization have standing to file?
- → Under Ohio fair housing enforcement, all of the following are possible consequences for a real estate licensee who engages in housing discrimination EXCEPT:
- → A real estate agent in Ohio is disciplined by both the OCRC (for civil rights violations) and the Superintendent of Real Estate (for license law violations). The agent argues that being punished twice for the same conduct violates double jeopardy. Under Ohio law, this argument is: