EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateState_specificEASY

Ingrid is purchasing a lakefront property in northern Minnesota. Her real estate agent mentions that the property's lot line extends to the ordinary high water mark of the lake. What does this mean for Ingrid's ownership rights regarding the lakebed?

Correct Answer

A) Ingrid owns the land up to the ordinary high water mark, and the state owns the lakebed below that mark on a public water

In Minnesota, for lakes classified as public waters, the state holds title to the lakebed below the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). A riparian landowner's property boundary typically extends to the OHWM, not into the lakebed. This means Ingrid owns the upland property to the OHWM, but the state owns the lakebed beneath the public water. This is established under Minnesota's public waters law (Minn. Stat. Ch. 103G) and the public trust doctrine.

Answer Options
A
Ingrid owns the land up to the ordinary high water mark, and the state owns the lakebed below that mark on a public water
B
Ingrid owns the lakebed to the center of the lake because her lot line reaches the ordinary high water mark
C
Ingrid owns all land and water to the far shoreline because she is the riparian owner
D
Ingrid owns the lakebed in front of her property because Minnesota grants lakebed ownership to adjacent riparian landowners

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

ordinary_high_water_marklakebed_ownershippublic_watersriparian_boundary

Related Concepts

Broker supervision is the legal obligation of a designated or managing broker to oversee and be accountable for the real estate activities of all salespersons and associate brokers operating under their license.

Commingling is the illegal act of mixing client funds with a broker's personal or business operating funds, while conversion is the unauthorized use of client funds for the broker's own benefit. Both are serious violations that can result in license revocation.

Commingling is the illegal act of mixing client trust funds with a broker's personal or business operating funds; conversion is the misappropriation of those funds.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing