EstatePass
Practice Of Real EstateLicense LawMEDIUM

A Massachusetts real estate salesperson, Chen, is found by the Board to have violated Board regulations by failing to provide the mandatory written agency disclosure at the first personal meeting with a buyer client. The Board issues a formal reprimand and places Chen on probation for one year. Chen believes the decision is wrong. What is Chen's proper legal recourse under Massachusetts law?

Correct Answer

A) Chen may appeal the Board's decision to the Massachusetts Superior Court for judicial review

Under Massachusetts law, a licensee aggrieved by a final decision of an administrative board such as BORREBS may seek judicial review in the Massachusetts Superior Court. This is consistent with the Massachusetts Administrative Procedure Act (MGL Chapter 30A), which provides for court review of agency decisions. The Superior Court reviews whether the Board's decision was supported by substantial evidence and consistent with law.

Answer Options
A
Chen may appeal the Board's decision to the Massachusetts Superior Court for judicial review
B
Chen may appeal the Board's decision directly to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
C
Chen must file a grievance with the Massachusetts Association of REALTORS® within 30 days
D
Chen has no right of appeal because Board decisions on license matters are final and unreviewable

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

appeal_rightsjudicial_reviewboard_decisionsadministrative_procedure

Related Concepts

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

A tie-in arrangement is an illegal antitrust practice in which a seller conditions the purchase of one product or service on the buyer's agreement to purchase a separate product or service.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Practice Of Real Estate Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing