EstatePass
Originationhard27% of exam

During intake, a valid changed circumstance raises a fee before the Closing Disclosure has been issued. What is the best compliant response?

Correct Answer

A) Issue a revised Loan Estimate within three business days

Why this is correct: The governing concept is that Regulation Z (12 CFR 1026.19(e)(3)(iv) and (e)(4)(i)) permits a creditor to issue a revised Loan Estimate after a valid changed circumstance occurs, such as a fee increase. The key procedural rule is that this revised disclosure must be provided to the borrower within three business days after the creditor receives information sufficient to establish that the changed circumstance has occurred. This timing requirement applies even before a Closing Disclosure is issued. Why the other choices are wrong: "Use a revised disclosure to reset tolerances without a documented event" is wrong because a revised disclosure requires a valid, documented changed circumstance; it cannot be used arbitrarily to reset fee tolerances. "Treat a rate lock as a changed circumstance for unrelated settlement fees" is wrong because a rate lock itself is not a valid changed circumstance that justifies increasing unrelated fees. "Ignore redisclosure timing because the borrower verbally accepted the new terms" is wrong because verbal acceptance does not waive the mandatory three-business-day redisclosure timing requirement under the TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure rules. Exam tip: Remember the sequence: valid changed circumstance → then a revised Loan Estimate must be issued within 3 business days of learning about it. The timing is strict and not waived by borrower consent.

Answer Options
A
Issue a revised Loan Estimate within three business days
B
Use a revised disclosure to reset tolerances without a documented event.
C
Treat a rate lock as a changed circumstance for unrelated settlement fees.
D
Ignore redisclosure timing because the borrower verbally accepted the new terms.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

The correct response is "Issue a revised Loan Estimate within three business days" because Lines 198-203; 12 CFR 1026.19(e)(3)(iv) and 1026.19(e)(4)(i).

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option B: Use a revised disclosure to reset tolerances without a documented event.

This choice is a tempting shortcut, but it conflicts with changed-circumstance documentation because the file still needs the required documentation, timing, or rule-based review before the action is taken.

Option C: Treat a rate lock as a changed circumstance for unrelated settlement fees.

This choice is not the best answer because it applies the wrong file step for changed-circumstance documentation; the governing rule is tested by the correct option.

Option D: Ignore redisclosure timing because the borrower verbally accepted the new terms.

This choice is a tempting shortcut, but it conflicts with changed-circumstance documentation because the file still needs the required documentation, timing, or rule-based review before the action is taken.

Memory Technique

changed-circumstance review: identify the rule being tested, then choose the action that documents or applies that rule before the file moves forward.

Exam Tip

For changed-circumstance documentation questions, separate the required file step from plausible sales, timing, or documentation shortcuts.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Choosing an internal exception instead of the governing rule
  • -Treating preliminary or informal facts as a substitute for required documentation
  • -Answering from a familiar but unrelated mortgage topic
Was this explanation helpful?

More Origination Questions

In a training scenario, the consumer locks the interest rate after the initial disclosure package. What action best follows the rule?

A mortgage file is paused during a risk-control review because of AIR Appraiser Independence. Which answer should explain the required action to the team?

A team member asks about Good Faith Dealing in a compliance desk review while trying to avoid a shortcut that would misapply the rule. Which response should the supervisor use?

A disclosure specialist is resolving Income Calculation Methods during an internal audit sample. Which action best fits the rule?

In a closing-readiness check, a quality-control reviewer sees facts tied to Self Employed Income Calculation. What should the file reflect?

During a disclosure desk review, a policy analyst encounters an Income Calculation Self Employed issue. Which response should decide how the file should be documented?

During a training quiz scenario, the loan team encounters an Income Calculation issue. Which response should resolve the issue before the file moves forward?

Before the team acts on a servicing handoff check, a closing coordinator must address Asset Verification and Reserves. Which response is most defensible?

An MLO is reviewing procedures for a case where a cost changes after the Closing Disclosure has already been provided. What is the proper handling?

During a post-application update, a quality-control reviewer encounters a Credit Analysis and Evaluation issue. Which response should avoid a shortcut that would misapply the rule?

People Also Study

Related Study Resources

Practice More MLO Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your SAFE MLO exam.

Start Practicing