EstatePass
Federal Lawshard24% of exam

A mortgage file is paused during a risk-control review because of USA PATRIOT Act CIP. Which answer should confirm the rule-based response?

Correct Answer

D) Document the suspicious pattern for compliance review

Why this is correct: The USA PATRIOT Act's Customer Identification Program (CIP) is part of broader Anti-Money Laundering (AML) requirements. A core rule is that if a suspicious pattern is detected during CIP or other processes, it must be documented and escalated for review, potentially leading to a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR). The correct action is to formally document the pattern for the compliance team's review, ensuring a rule-based, documented response. Why the other choices are wrong: "Use an internal exception instead of the required federal disclosure or timing rule" is wrong because AML/CIP rules are federal mandates that cannot be bypassed by internal policy exceptions. "Resolve the USA PATRIOT Act CIP issue with the state renewal exception that does not fit the facts" is wrong because applying an irrelevant exception (like a state license renewal issue) does not address the federal CIP/AML compliance requirement. "Rely on oral agreement when the rule requires documented compliance" is wrong because AML compliance, especially regarding suspicious activity, requires formal documentation, not informal oral agreements. Exam tip: For BSA/AML/USA PATRIOT Act questions, think "document and escalate" when suspicious activity is involved. Confidentiality of SARs is also key.

Answer Options
A
Use an internal exception instead of the required federal disclosure or timing rule.
B
Resolve the USA PATRIOT Act CIP issue with the state renewal exception that does not fit the facts.
C
Rely on oral agreement when the rule requires documented compliance.
D
Document the suspicious pattern for compliance review

Why This Is the Correct Answer

The correct response is "Document the suspicious pattern for compliance review" because RMLO AML and SAR rules require suspicious activity escalation and confidentiality.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: Use an internal exception instead of the required federal disclosure or timing rule.

Use an internal exception instead of the required federal disclosure or timing rule. is not correct because it does not apply the rule tested by this file scenario.

Option B: Resolve the USA PATRIOT Act CIP issue with the state renewal exception that does not fit the facts.

This distractor shifts the issue to a different trigger, product, or timing rule instead of applying the rule tested in the stem.

Option C: Rely on oral agreement when the rule requires documented compliance.

Rely on oral agreement when the rule requires documented compliance. is not correct because it does not apply the rule tested by this file scenario.

Memory Technique

USA PATRIOT Act CIP: identify the rule being tested, then choose the action that documents or applies that rule before the file moves forward.

Exam Tip

Match the file facts to USA PATRIOT Act CIP; do not choose an exception or shortcut that skips the required rule.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Choosing an internal exception instead of the governing rule
  • -Treating preliminary or informal facts as a substitute for required documentation
  • -Answering from a familiar but unrelated mortgage topic
Was this explanation helpful?

More Federal Laws Questions

People Also Study

Related Study Resources

Practice More MLO Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your SAFE MLO exam.

Start Practicing