A disclosure specialist compares the file facts with TILA Loan Estimate Requirements during a licensing team review. Which conclusion is accurate?
Correct Answer
C) Issue a revised Loan Estimate within three business days when valid
Why this is correct: Under TILA and Regulation Z, a revised Loan Estimate can be issued only when a valid changed circumstance occurs, such as information becoming inaccurate or new information affecting settlement charges. The rule requires that if a revised Loan Estimate is permitted, it must be provided to the borrower within three business days after the lender learns of the changed circumstance. The original explanation anchors this by stating revised estimates are allowed only when Regulation Z conditions and timing are met. Why the other choices are wrong: "Use a revised disclosure to reset tolerances without a documented event" is wrong because you cannot reset tolerances arbitrarily; a valid changed circumstance must be documented. "Treat a rate lock as a changed circumstance for unrelated settlement fees" is wrong because a rate lock alone is not a valid changed circumstance for fees unrelated to the rate lock. "Ignore redisclosure timing because the borrower verbally accepted the new terms" is wrong because verbal acceptance does not waive the mandatory three-business-day timing requirement for providing a revised Loan Estimate in writing. Exam tip: Remember the three-business-day clock starts when the lender learns of the valid changed circumstance, not when the borrower agrees.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
The correct response is "Issue a revised Loan Estimate within three business days when valid" because Changed circumstances can permit revised estimates only when Regulation Z conditions and timing are met.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Use a revised disclosure to reset tolerances without a documented event.
This choice is a tempting shortcut, but it conflicts with changed-circumstance documentation because the file still needs the required documentation, timing, or rule-based review before the action is taken.
Option B: Treat a rate lock as a changed circumstance for unrelated settlement fees.
This choice is not the best answer because it applies the wrong file step for changed-circumstance documentation; the governing rule is tested by the correct option.
Option D: Ignore redisclosure timing because the borrower verbally accepted the new terms.
This choice is a tempting shortcut, but it conflicts with changed-circumstance documentation because the file still needs the required documentation, timing, or rule-based review before the action is taken.
Memory Technique
changed-circumstance review: identify the rule being tested, then choose the action that documents or applies that rule before the file moves forward.
Exam Tip
For changed-circumstance documentation questions, separate the required file step from plausible sales, timing, or documentation shortcuts.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Choosing an internal exception instead of the governing rule
- -Treating preliminary or informal facts as a substitute for required documentation
- -Answering from a familiar but unrelated mortgage topic
More Origination Questions
Before the team acts on a servicing handoff check, a closing coordinator must address Asset Verification and Reserves. Which response is most defensible?
An MLO is reviewing procedures for a case where a cost changes after the Closing Disclosure has already been provided. What is the proper handling?
During a post-application update, a quality-control reviewer encounters a Credit Analysis and Evaluation issue. Which response should avoid a shortcut that would misapply the rule?
A construction-to-permanent loan will disburse in 5 draws over 11 months before the permanent phase begins. Which Regulation Z appendix provides a disclosure method for multiple-advance construction transactions?
Before closing, the team discovers that a borrower asks which upfront charge can be collected before intent to proceed. What is the safest compliant answer?
A construction loan agreement allows advances only after documented completion of specified work. A builder requests the next draw, but no completion evidence has been provided. What should occur?
Before releasing the final construction draw, which combination most directly supports project completion and clear collateral?
A construction-to-permanent loan will convert to a substantially higher fully amortizing payment. Which payment is especially important when assessing the borrower's long-term repayment capacity?
A construction-to-permanent note states that conversion requires completion, a certificate of occupancy, and no unresolved liens. Construction is finished, but a mechanic's lien remains. What should happen?
A branch manager asks about a loan file because a processor wants to omit known monthly obligations from underwriting. What should happen?
People Also Study
Federal Mortgage-Related Laws
24% of exam
General Mortgage Knowledge
20% of exam
Ethics, Fraud & Consumer Protection
18% of exam
Uniform State Test Content
11% of exam
Related Study Resources
Previous Question
An MLO is reviewing procedures for a case where the file has borrower statements but no verified ability-to-repay analysis. What is the proper handling?
Next Question
A purchase at $480,000 has a first mortgage of $384,000 and the seller will carry a $24,000 second. The program caps CLTV at 85%. Using $480,000 as the property value, what is the CLTV and does it meet the stated 85% cap?