EstatePass
Pa Rela License LawDisciplinary_processMEDIUM

Under RELA, a Pennsylvania broker, James, is subject to SREC discipline after one of his salespersons forged a client's signature on a purchase agreement. James had no direct involvement in the forgery. The SREC charges James with failure to supervise. At the hearing, what must the SREC prove to sustain the charge?

Correct Answer

A) That James failed to establish or enforce adequate supervisory policies and procedures that should have prevented or detected the salesperson's misconduct

Under RELA (63 P.S. §455.604), to sustain a failure-to-supervise charge, the SREC must show that the broker failed to establish or enforce adequate supervisory systems. The broker's personal participation or presence is not required; the issue is whether reasonable supervisory measures were in place.

Answer Options
A
That James failed to establish or enforce adequate supervisory policies and procedures that should have prevented or detected the salesperson's misconduct
B
That James profited financially from the forged transaction
C
That James personally participated in the forgery
D
That James was present in the office at the exact time the forgery occurred

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Pa Rela License Law Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Pa Rela License Law

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Pa Rela License Law

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Pa Rela License Law Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

failure_to_superviseburden_of_proofsupervisory_systemsdisciplinary_processRELA

Related Concepts

Broker supervision is the legal obligation of a designated or managing broker to oversee and be accountable for the real estate activities of all salespersons and associate brokers operating under their license.

Commingling is the illegal act of mixing client funds with a broker's personal or business operating funds, while conversion is the unauthorized use of client funds for the broker's own benefit. Both are serious violations that can result in license revocation.

Commingling is the illegal act of mixing client trust funds with a broker's personal or business operating funds; conversion is the misappropriation of those funds.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Pa Rela License Law Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing