EstatePass
Oh License Law Orc 4735Superintendent_vs_commissionMEDIUM

A broker receives a disciplinary order issued by the Superintendent of Real Estate and challenges it in court, arguing the Ohio Real Estate Commission had jurisdiction to hear the case. Under ORC Chapter 4735, how would a court most likely rule?

Correct Answer

D) The court would uphold the Superintendent's disciplinary order because ORC Chapter 4735 vests that authority in the Superintendent, not the Commission

Under ORC §4735.02 and §4735.18, disciplinary authority over licensees is expressly vested in the Superintendent of Real Estate. The Commission does not hold concurrent or primary disciplinary jurisdiction. A reviewing court would uphold the Superintendent's order as consistent with the statutory framework.

Answer Options
A
The court would remand the case to the Commission because disciplinary matters require a multi-member panel to satisfy due process
B
The court would rule that the Superintendent and Commission share concurrent jurisdiction and either body may hear disciplinary cases
C
The court would rule that the Superintendent exceeded statutory authority and void the disciplinary order
D
The court would uphold the Superintendent's disciplinary order because ORC Chapter 4735 vests that authority in the Superintendent, not the Commission

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Oh License Law Orc 4735 Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Oh License Law Orc 4735

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Oh License Law Orc 4735

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Oh License Law Orc 4735 Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

superintendent_vs_commissiondisciplinary_authorityjudicial_reviewORC_4735

Related Concepts

Price fixing is an illegal antitrust practice in which competing real estate brokerages agree to charge the same commission rates, fees, or other pricing for their services. It is a per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Florida brokers are required to maintain transaction records and escrow records for a minimum of five years.

A tie-in arrangement is an illegal antitrust practice in which a seller conditions the purchase of one product or service on the buyer's agreement to purchase a separate product or service.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Oh License Law Orc 4735 Questions

People Also Study

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing