EstatePass
Fair Housing Ny Human Rights LawNyc_specific_fair_housingHARD

A luxury building in Manhattan advertises 'No guarantors accepted - income must be from applicant only.' This policy disproportionately affects young renters, immigrants, and people with non-traditional income sources. Under NYC Human Rights Law, what is the strongest legal challenge?

Correct Answer

D) Source of income discrimination by limiting acceptable income verification methods

This policy constitutes source of income discrimination by artificially limiting how applicants can demonstrate their ability to pay rent. NYC Human Rights Law protects against discrimination based on source of income, and prohibiting guarantors restricts legitimate methods of income verification and payment.

Answer Options
A
Age discrimination with disparate impact on young renters
B
The policy is permissible as a uniform business practice applied to all applicants
C
National origin discrimination through disparate impact on immigrants
D
Source of income discrimination by limiting acceptable income verification methods

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Fair Housing Ny Human Rights Law Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Fair Housing Ny Human Rights Law

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Fair Housing Ny Human Rights Law

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Fair Housing Ny Human Rights Law Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

guarantorssource_of_incomeincome_verificationluxury_building

Related Concepts

Broker supervision is the legal obligation of a designated or managing broker to oversee and be accountable for the real estate activities of all salespersons and associate brokers operating under their license.

Commingling is the illegal act of mixing client funds with a broker's personal or business operating funds, while conversion is the unauthorized use of client funds for the broker's own benefit. Both are serious violations that can result in license revocation.

Commingling is the illegal act of mixing client trust funds with a broker's personal or business operating funds; conversion is the misappropriation of those funds.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Fair Housing Ny Human Rights Law Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing