After a California non-judicial foreclosure sale, the borrower has:
Correct Answer
A) No statutory right of redemption
California does not provide a statutory right of redemption after a non-judicial foreclosure sale. Once the trustee's sale occurs, the borrower's redemption rights are extinguished.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
No statutory right of redemption is correct. California does not provide a statutory right of redemption after a non-judicial foreclosure sale. Once the trustee's sale occurs, the borrower's redemption rights are extinguished. California does not provide a statutory right of redemption after a non-judicial foreclosure sale. Once the trustee's sale occurs, the borrower's redemption rights are extinguished.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: A 6-month right of redemption
A six-month statutory redemption period is associated with some judicial foreclosure contexts, not California nonjudicial foreclosure after trustee sale.
Option C: A 90-day right of redemption
90 days is the NOD reinstatement period before the sale, not a post-sale redemption period.
Option D: A 1-year right of redemption
A 1-year redemption period may apply after judicial foreclosure, but not non-judicial.
Memory Technique
CA -> ca-foreclosure-property-servicing-and-debt-collection
Exam Tip
Legacy California general items should be used sparingly; they are kept officially supported for existing content but new MLO growth should focus more on DFPI/DRE, CFL, CRMLA, covered-loan, and usury rules.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Using a national baseline answer when California has agency-specific DFPI or DRE requirements
- -Confusing CFL, CRMLA, covered-loan, usury, servicing, and DRE endorsement rules
- -Relying on legacy California state-exam or education assumptions instead of current NMLS source pages
More UST Questions
A Washington broker provides the federal settlement service estimates and booklet in 2026 and no separate state itemization. Can disclosures compliant with RESPA and Regulation X satisfy the state third-party itemization subsection?
Priya is comparing pre-license education providers before applying for a Florida mortgage loan originator license. How many hours of approved pre-license education must she complete in total?
An applicant is budgeting for a Florida MLO license and asks what the state application fee comes to at filing. Which figure is correct?
A newly sponsored Florida MLO is told she must buy an individual surety bond in her own name before she can originate. Is that correct?
A Washington consumer loan act licensee also brokers loans in 2026 outside the authority of that act. Does the consumer-loan-act exemption extend to mortgage brokerage outside that act’s authority?
A $200,000 Texas home equity loan has $3,700 in fees subject to the constitutional cap and a separate $600 fee for an appraisal performed by a third-party appraiser. Do the capped fees exceed the limit?
An owner applies for a Texas home equity loan on 4 May 2026 and the lender delivers the required notice on 8 May. Which date starts the constitutional 12-day waiting period for closing?
An owner closed a Texas home equity loan on 3 February 2026 and wants a second one on the same homestead in November 2026. Assuming no declared-emergency exception applies and the earlier home equity lien will be paid off, may the new loan close in November?
A Texas home equity loan forecloses and the sale leaves the lender $62,000 short of the balance owed. Absent actual fraud in obtaining the credit, may the lender recover the shortfall personally from the owner or spouse?
A Washington real estate broker helps a 2026 buyer arrange financing and takes only the usual sales commission. Does financing assistance incidental to a bona fide sale for only the customary real-estate commission fall within the exemption?
People Also Study
Federal Mortgage-Related Laws
24% of exam
General Mortgage Knowledge
20% of exam
Mortgage Loan Origination Activities
27% of exam
Ethics, Fraud & Consumer Protection
18% of exam