What pre-licensure education does NMLS list for a California-DFPI MLO applicant?
Correct Answer
A) 20 hours total, including 2 California-DFPI law hours
NMLS lists California-DFPI PE as 20 total hours, including 2 California-DFPI law hours. The prior legacy 23-hour/3-hour answer was outdated.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
NMLS lists California-DFPI PE as 20 total hours, including 2 California-DFPI law hours. The prior legacy 23-hour/3-hour answer was outdated.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: 20 hours total, including 3 California-DRE law hours
California-DRE and California-DFPI are separate license/endorsement paths. The tested CA-DFPI official source set lists 20 total PE hours including 2 California-DFPI law hours, not 3 California-DRE law hours.
Option C: 23 hours total, including 3 California-specific hours
The prior 23-hour/3-hour wording is outdated for the CA-DFPI rule tested here.
Option D: 25 hours total, including 5 California-specific hours
25 total hours with 5 California-specific hours overstates the current CA-DFPI PE requirement in the official source set.
Memory Technique
CA -> ca-dfpi-dre-MLO-licensing-education-renewal
Exam Tip
California questions often require separating DFPI and DRE authority, current NMLS CA-DFPI and CA-DRE education tables, annual renewal, DRE endorsement timing, and the national SAFE test with UST.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Using a national baseline answer when California has agency-specific DFPI or DRE requirements
- -Confusing CFL, CRMLA, covered-loan, usury, servicing, and DRE endorsement rules
- -Relying on legacy California state-exam or education assumptions instead of current NMLS source pages
More UST Questions
In a pricing desk question, an audit analyst sees facts tied to Prohibited Misrepresentation. What should the file reflect?
An applicant previously had an MLO license revoked by a state regulator. Under the SAFE Act minimum standards for a new state-licensed MLO license, which statement is correct?
Which statement correctly distinguishes a license suspension from a license revocation?
A state regulator has issued an order suspending an MLO's authority effective immediately. The MLO has filed an appeal, but no stay has been granted. What should the MLO do?
An MLO license application asks whether the applicant has been the subject of a regulatory order. The applicant has a recent consent order that falls within the question. What is the proper response?
Why does NMLS maintain licensing and enforcement information that participating regulators can access?
A regulator issues a final license suspension without giving the MLO notice of the alleged violation or any opportunity to respond, even though applicable law requires both. What issue is presented?
A regulator finds that an MLO charged consumers prohibited fees. Which set of actions is consistent with the enforcement tools contemplated by Regulation H?
An MLO's license status in NMLS changes to suspended, with no stay or reinstatement shown. What is the immediate operational effect?
Which fact most directly supports disciplinary action against an MLO rather than merely a request for additional application information?
People Also Study
Federal Mortgage-Related Laws
24% of exam
General Mortgage Knowledge
20% of exam
Mortgage Loan Origination Activities
27% of exam
Ethics, Fraud & Consumer Protection
18% of exam