EstatePass
Federal Lawshard24% of exam

A flood determination identifies two structures on the collateral: a residence and a detached storage shed that does not serve as a residence. Which statement is most accurate?

Correct Answer

C) The lender should evaluate whether the statutory detached-structure exemption applies to the shed

Why this is correct: Federal flood regulations include a specific exemption for detached structures that do not serve as a residence, such as a storage shed. The lender's duty is to actively evaluate whether this statutory exemption applies to the specific shed based on its use and characteristics, not to make automatic assumptions. Why the other choices are wrong: The statement "The shed can never be considered separately" is wrong because the law does allow for separate consideration of detached structures. The statement "Both structures must always carry identical coverage" is wrong because the exemption, if applicable, could relieve the requirement for the shed. The statement "The residence is exempt because a shed is present" is wrong because the presence of a shed does not exempt the primary residence from flood insurance requirements. Exam tip: Remember that detached, non-residential structures require a case-by-case evaluation for a possible flood insurance exemption; don't assume automatic coverage or exemption.

Answer Options
A
The shed can never be considered separately
B
Both structures must always carry identical coverage
C
The lender should evaluate whether the statutory detached-structure exemption applies to the shed
D
The residence is exempt because a shed is present

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Why this is correct: Federal flood regulations include a specific exemption for detached structures that do not serve as a residence, such as a storage shed. The lender's duty is to actively evaluate whether this statutory exemption applies to the specific shed based on its use and characteristics, not to make automatic assumptions. Why the other choices are wrong: The statement "The shed can never be considered separately" is wrong because the law does allow for separate consideration of detached structures. The statement "Both structures must always carry identical coverage" is wrong because the exemption, if applicable, could relieve the requirement for the shed. The statement "The residence is exempt because a shed is present" is wrong because the presence of a shed does not exempt the primary residence from flood insurance requirements. Exam tip: Remember that detached, non-residential structures require a case-by-case evaluation for a possible flood insurance exemption; don't assume automatic coverage or exemption.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Federal Laws Questions

People Also Study

Related Study Resources

Practice More MLO Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your SAFE MLO exam.

Start Practicing