PERSONAL RISK CONCEPTS · 6 MIN READ
Property Valuation: ACV, Replacement Cost, Coinsurance
How much a property claim pays depends on the valuation standard. Actual Cash Value (ACV) is the indemnity default, and courts define it three ways: replacement cost less depreciation (the majority rule and the usual policy formula), fair market value, or the broad evidence rule, which lets the fact-finder weigh any relevant evidence of value — replacement cost less depreciation, market value, age, condition, use, and obsolescence. The straight-line math is testable: a five-year-old roof with a twenty-year useful life is 25 percent depreciated, so a $12,000 replacement cost yields a $9,000 ACV before the deductible. Replacement Cost Value (RCV) pays the cost to replace with new materials of like kind and quality, without deduction for depreciation. Personal lines policies do not use the commercial-style proportional coinsurance penalty; instead the homeowners form conditions replacement-cost settlement on insuring the dwelling to at least 80 percent of its full replacement cost at the time of loss. Meet the threshold and partial losses pay at RCV up to the limit. Fall below it and partial losses pay the greater of ACV or a proportional replacement-cost figure (limit carried divided by 80 percent of replacement cost, times the loss). This is gentler than true coinsurance — small shortfalls rarely hurt small claims — but inflation-driven underinsurance can badly erode recovery on a large partial loss. Where classic coinsurance does appear, the formula is did-over-should: (insurance carried divided by insurance required) times the loss, less the deductible. Specialty standards fill the gaps. Functional replacement cost repairs with less costly but functionally equivalent materials — useful when modern materials replace obsolete construction — and modified replacement cost serves historic buildings on the same logic. Stated value, agreed value, and actual value differ in bindingness: an agreed value is settled at policy issuance and paid in full at total loss, while a stated amount typically operates only as a maximum, with the insurer still free to pay ACV if lower. The pair-and-set doctrine handles partial loss to matched items: losing one earring of a pair pays the difference between the value of the set before and after the loss — not the full set, and not an automatic half. Salvage rights let the insurer take over damaged property it has paid for, another corollary of indemnity.
Key rules
ACV usually equals replacement cost minus depreciation, but definitions vary.
The three judicial approaches are replacement cost less depreciation (majority), fair market value, and the broad evidence rule weighing all relevant value evidence.
Why the exam cares: Exams test both the default formula and the broad evidence rule as a named alternative.
Homeowners RCV settlement requires insuring the dwelling to at least 80% of replacement cost.
At or above 80 percent, partial losses pay RCV up to the limit; below it, they pay the greater of ACV or the proportional formula (limit divided by 80 percent of replacement cost, times loss).
Why the exam cares: The 80 percent trigger is the personal lines substitute for coinsurance and appears in calculation questions.
The coinsurance formula is carried over required, times the loss, minus the deductible.
The insured who carries less than the required percentage of value becomes a co-insurer of every partial loss in proportion to the shortfall.
Why the exam cares: Coinsurance math is a guaranteed calculation item — set up the fraction before touching the loss amount.
Agreed value pays the scheduled amount at total loss; stated value is only a cap.
Agreed value fixes the payout at issuance; a stated amount limits the maximum but still allows ACV settlement if that is lower.
Why the exam cares: The agreed-versus-stated distinction is a subtle wording trap on scheduled-property questions.
Pair-and-set losses pay the value difference of the set, not the whole set.
Losing one of a matched pair pays the set's value before the loss minus its value after — often more than half but less than the full set.
Why the exam cares: Exams use jewelry scenarios to test that neither full-set payment nor automatic halves is correct.
Numbers to memorize
- 80% — insurance-to-replacement-cost trigger for RCV settlement on the dwelling
- ACV = replacement cost − depreciation — the majority-rule formula
- $12,000 − 25% = $9,000 — ACV of a 5-year-old roof with a 20-year life (straight-line depreciation)
- (carried ÷ required) × loss − deductible — the coinsurance recovery formula
Common traps
- Applying commercial coinsurance penalties to homeowners policies — the HO form uses the 80 percent replacement-cost trigger, with below-threshold losses paying the greater of ACV or the proportional amount.
- Confusing agreed value with stated value — agreed value guarantees the scheduled payout; stated value is merely a ceiling over an ACV settlement.
- Paying the full set for loss of one item — pair-and-set pays the before-and-after difference in the set's value.
- Forgetting depreciation runs on age over useful life — set up the fraction (age divided by expected life) before computing ACV.
For every valuation calculation, write the formula skeleton first — depreciation fraction or did-over-should — and only then plug in the dollar figures.
Test it before the exam does
Our PL bank drills Personal Risk Concepts with AI-explained answers. 20 questions free, no signup.
Taking the PL exam in your state?
Studying for the Personal Lines insurance exam? Track every lesson free — progress syncs with the app.
Start free