EstatePass

Footings & Foundations — ICC B1 Practice Questions

67 questions · 16% of the ICC B1 exam

Worked questions

1. A prescriptive continuous concrete footing governed by 2021 IRC R403.1.1 is 26 inches wide and 8 inches thick, centered under an 8-inch wall. No engineered alternative is proposed. Considering only that section’s projection limit, what is the finding?

  • AIt passes because each projection exceeds the minimum 2 inches
  • BIt passes because extra footing width always makes the design compliant
  • It fails because each 9-inch projection exceeds the 8-inch footing thickness
  • DIt fails because the projection limit is always 6 inches

Where to look it up

https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

Why C is correct

Projection per side is (26 − 8) / 2 = 9 inches. R403.1.1 requires at least 2 inches of projection and limits it to footing thickness; 9 exceeds 8. This is a prescriptive geometry deficiency. It is not proof that concrete of every possible design cannot carry the load. A proposed correction must also satisfy the applicable bearing, width, thickness, reinforcement and design requirements; narrowing the footing to 24 inches is not automatically an acceptable repair. See printed p.4-8. Source: https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

2. In a bearing-only calculation, assume a concentric wall load of 2,400 pounds per linear foot and an allowable uniform soil pressure of 1,500 pounds per square foot. A strip footing is 16 inches wide. Which result follows, considering only these supplied values?

  • AThe width passes because a footing is always twice the wall thickness
  • BThe required width is always 24 inches regardless of soil pressure
  • CIncreasing concrete compressive strength alone reduces the calculated soil pressure
  • The width fails this check: required bearing width is 19.2 inches

Where to look it up

Explicit exercise assumptions; not a universal code requirement.

Why D is correct

Required width = 2,400 / 1,500 = 1.6 feet = 19.2 inches. At 16 inches, bearing pressure = 2,400 / (16 / 12) = 1,800 psf, 20 percent above the stated limit. The calculation does not itself require rounding to 20 inches or approve a footing redesign. Thickness, reinforcement, settlement and other applicable requirements need separate checks.

3. A continuous footing trench drops 24 inches over a 15-foot horizontal run. It is proposed without steps under the prescriptive provisions of 2021 IRC R403.1.5. What is the finding on the bottom slope?

  • AIt passes because the maximum bottom slope is 1:5
  • BIt passes because the bottom slope is unrestricted if the top is level
  • It fails because its 1:7.5 slope is steeper than 1:10, requiring steps
  • DIt fails because stepped footings are prohibited

Where to look it up

https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

Why C is correct

Convert 15 feet to 180 inches: horizontal run / fall = 180 / 24 = 7.5, giving 1 vertical to 7.5 horizontal. R403.1.5 limits the bottom slope to 1:10 and requires stepping where that limit would be exceeded or where top elevation must change. It separately requires a level top surface. The bottom slope establishes the stated defect without assuming the unobserved top surface is also sloping. See printed p.4-10. Source: https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

4. A plain masonry foundation wall is being checked using 2021 IRC Table R404.1.1(1). An interior concrete slab-on-grade is provided and contacts the wall’s interior surface. Under footnote c, which unbalanced-backfill-height measurement is permitted?

  • ATop of wall to exterior finished grade
  • BExterior finished grade to the bottom of the footing
  • Exterior finished grade to the top of the interior concrete slab
  • DTop of wall to the top of the slab

Where to look it up

https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

Why C is correct

Footnote c normally measures the difference from exterior finished ground to the lower of the supporting footing’s top or interior finished ground. It permits measurement to the interior concrete slab’s top when a slab-on-grade is provided in contact with the foundation wall’s interior surface. The question explicitly supplies that contact condition. This definition does not establish all lateral-support or backfill-construction requirements, nor does simply finishing any slab automatically authorize reducing a wall design. See Table R404.1.1(1), printed p.4-23. Source: https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

5. An under-floor crawl space contains discarded wood forms, scrap construction lumber and buried stumps on its grade. Under 2021 IRC R408.5, which action is required before occupancy or use?

  • ATreat every discarded item as a non-code housekeeping preference
  • BLeave the discarded construction materials on blocks
  • Clear the grade of vegetation and organic material and remove the wood forms and construction materials
  • DCover all the debris with a vapor retarder and leave it in place

Where to look it up

https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

Why C is correct

R408.5 requires under-floor grade to be cleared of vegetation and organic material and requires removal of concrete wood forms and construction materials before occupancy or use. The discarded forms, lumber and stumps in the question require removal; stacking or covering them is not removal. This does not establish that every permitted wood construction component in soil violates the code, or guarantee future insect attack. The question concerns the debris rule rather than a universal certificate-enforcement procedure. See printed p.4-45. Source: https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

6. The approved plans specify 3,000 psi concrete for the foundation, but the delivery ticket in the driver hand describes a 2,500 psi mix, and no revision has been submitted to the department. What is the correct action?

  • ARelease the placement, because 2,500 psi is the code minimum for structural concrete and is therefore acceptable in a footing of any size.
  • BRelease the placement if the driver adds water at the site to improve the workability of the mix just before it is discharged.
  • CLet the pour proceed and then require core testing of the finished footing before any of the framing is allowed to start.
  • Hold the placement, because the mix delivered has to match the strength shown on the approved plans unless a revision is approved.

Where to look it up

https://www.nrmca.org/association-resources/research-and-engineering/frequently-asked-questions-on-concrete-materials/

Why D is correct

The delivered mix is specified at 2,500 psi, below the 3,000 psi required by the supplied approved plans. Hold this placement while the discrepancy is resolved through the applicable approval process. Neither extra water nor a promise of later testing resolves that mismatch. This does not mean that all jobsite water adjustments are prohibited or that destructive testing is the only way to assess placed concrete.

7. At the required inspection before concealment, a cast-in-place foundation wall has open aggregate voids along its bottom 12 inches and visible reinforcing bar where the approved detail requires concrete cover. No evaluation or repair has been approved. Under 2021 IRC R404.1.3.3.5 and R109.4, what is appropriate?

  • AApprove because backfill will hide the area
  • BApprove solely after a cosmetic cement-slurry rub
  • CApprove solely because standard mix cylinders met specified strength
  • Withhold acceptance of the affected work pending evaluation and an approved compliant correction before concealment

Where to look it up

https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

Why D is correct

R404.1.3.3.5 requires suitable concrete consolidation, including around reinforcement and embedded items and into form corners. R109.4 requires noncompliant work to be corrected and prohibits its concealment until authorized. The stated voids and missing specified cover require evaluation of the in-place condition and a compliant correction. A favorable sample-cylinder result alone does not establish the required consolidation and cover at that location; neither does hiding it with coating or backfill. The observations do not quantify remaining capacity or establish that every affected wall must be demolished, or that one generic patch can restore every defect. Source: https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

8. In a severe-weathering area, a truck is supplying an attached garage floor slab and an exterior porch slab exposed to weather. The specified 28-day concrete strength is 3,000 psi. Considering only specified strength under 2021 IRC Table R402.2, what is the finding?

  • A3,000 psi meets every residential-concrete entry in a severe-weathering area
  • BAir entrainment automatically permits reducing the listed strength
  • The specified strength is below the 3,500 psi minimum for this row in severe weathering
  • DEvery slab on ground requires at least 4,000 psi in severe weathering

Where to look it up

https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

Why C is correct

The row for porches, carport slabs and steps exposed to weather, and garage floor slabs, requires 3,500 psi in severe weathering. The 3,000 psi specification is 500 psi short. The same row is 3,000 psi in moderate weathering, not 3,500 psi as the old explanation stated. Air entrainment is addressed separately; footnote f permits reduced air content for steel-troweled garage floors only when specified strength is increased to at least 4,000 psi. This strength-only question does not certify air content, mix proportions or all other requirements. Source: https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

9. A concrete foundation encloses usable below-grade space. The documented bearing ground is a well-drained sand-gravel mixture classified as Group I under 2021 IRC Table R405.1. Considering R405.1’s soil exception, is a foundation drainage system required by that section?

  • AYes, with no soil exception
  • BYes, unless the basement remains unfinished forever
  • CNo, because a temporarily dry excavation alone is sufficient
  • No; the stated soil condition satisfies the section’s drainage exception

Where to look it up

https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

Why D is correct

R405.1 generally requires drainage around concrete or masonry foundations retaining earth and enclosing below-grade habitable or usable space. Its exception covers the stated well-drained ground or Group I sand-gravel condition. Classification and actual ground conditions, rather than a few days of dry weather, support the finding here. This conclusion is limited to R405.1 and does not waive unrelated site drainage, waterproofing or locally adopted requirements. See printed p.4-42. Source: https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

10. For a bearing-only calculation, a 24-inch by 30-inch pad carries a concentric total load of 7,000 pounds. Assume uniform soil pressure and a specified allowable pressure of 1,500 psf. Which calculation is correct?

  • Area is 5 square feet; pressure is 1,400 psf, below the supplied limit
  • BThe pad is inadequate, because 4 square feet of bearing area produces 1,750 pounds per square foot.
  • CThe pad is inadequate, because 7,000 pounds spread across the 2-foot width works out to 3,500 pounds per square foot.
  • DThe pad is adequate, because a pad at least 24 inches in each direction may be used with any soil listed in the presumptive table.

Where to look it up

Explicit exercise assumptions; not a universal code requirement.

Why A is correct

Area = (24 / 12) × (30 / 12) = 5 square feet. Pressure = 7,000 / 5 = 1,400 psf, below 1,500 psf. This establishes only the stated uniform bearing check; it does not approve thickness, reinforcement, settlement, soil classification or construction.

11. For a bearing calculation, use a uniform load of 60 psf over a supplied tributary width of 14 feet. A strip footing is 16 inches wide. Assume this is the complete concentric load being evaluated and uniform bearing. What soil pressure results?

  • A840 pounds per square foot
  • 630 pounds per square foot
  • C1,260 pounds per square foot
  • D420 pounds per square foot

Where to look it up

Explicit exercise assumptions; not a universal code requirement.

Why B is correct

Load per linear foot = 60 × 14 = 840 pounds. Bearing area per linear foot = 16 / 12 square feet. Pressure = 840 / (16 / 12) = 630 psf. Tributary width is given, not derived from a universal half-span rule. This calculation alone does not establish overall footing adequacy.

12. During placement, the crew requests 15 gallons of additional water. The producer confirms that the batch has already received its full permitted design water, with zero allowance remaining. What response follows from this condition?

  • AAccept it; water added at the site is a normal adjustment and the strength of the mix is set at the plant, not on the job
  • BAccept it; the mix will still reach the specified strength provided the crew vibrates the concrete thoroughly after placement
  • Reject the addition; the strength depends on the water-cement ratio, so water beyond the design allowance must not be added
  • DReject the entire load; once any water is added at the site the concrete is no longer the mix the plans specify

Where to look it up

https://www.nrmca.org/association-resources/research-and-engineering/frequently-asked-questions-on-concrete-materials/

Why C is correct

Reject the requested addition because it exceeds the confirmed design allowance. The issue is not simply that water would be added onsite. NRMCA allows qualifying adjustments when required slump has not been reached and design water is not exceeded; additions must be documented. This finding does not by itself require rejecting the entire load or predict its measured strength.

13. For a geometry exercise only, draw a plane sloping downward and outward at 45 degrees from a footing edge. A trench bottom is 18 inches horizontally outward from that edge and 14 inches below it. Where is the bottom relative to the stated plane?

  • AIt is 4 inches below the plane
  • BIt is exactly on the plane
  • It is 4 inches above the plane
  • DIt is 18 inches above the plane

Where to look it up

Explicit exercise assumptions; not a universal code requirement.

Why C is correct

A 45-degree plane drops one inch per horizontal inch. At 18 inches outward it is 18 inches below the edge; the trench bottom is only 14 inches below. The bottom is therefore 18 − 14 = 4 inches above the plane. This checks a hypothetical geometry model, not actual soil stability, excavation clearance or code compliance.

14. For this approved-plan comparison only, the supplied table permits an 8-inch wall up to 4 feet of unbalanced backfill, a 10-inch wall up to 5 feet, and a 12-inch wall up to 6 feet. The installed wall is 8 inches with 5 feet 4 inches of backfill. Which conclusion follows?

  • AIt meets the supplied 8-inch-wall limit
  • It exceeds the supplied 8-inch-wall limit
  • CIt meets the limit because every wall allows 6 feet
  • DIt exceeds the limit by only 4 inches

Where to look it up

Explicit exercise assumptions; not a universal code requirement.

Why B is correct

The actual backfill is 5 × 12 + 4 = 64 inches. The supplied 8-inch-wall limit is 4 × 12 = 48 inches, so it is exceeded by 16 inches. This comparison identifies a discrepancy; it does not approve another wall thickness or establish a universal masonry table.

15. An approved foundation plan shows a continuous footing under an interior bearing wall. The crew leaves a 3-foot gap for a sewer pipe, with no approved bridging member, alternate support or revised detail. Under 2021 IRC R301.1 and R106.4, how should this be judged?

  • AAutomatically acceptable because any stud wall can span a 3-foot footing gap
  • BAutomatically acceptable because the code waives all footing gaps shorter than 4 feet
  • The unapproved support interruption requires a compliant load-path and approved corrective design
  • DAll sewer piping must be moved outside because pipes can never cross a footing line

Where to look it up

https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

Why C is correct

R301.1 requires construction to carry applicable loads and provide a complete load path to the foundation. R106.4 requires changes not complying with approved documents to be resubmitted for approval. The stated omission removes support shown in the approved detail without an approved means of transferring that load. That is enough to withhold acceptance; it does not prove an exact load concentration or that every framed wall has zero bridging capacity. A revised footing, designed bridge or other approved arrangement must address the actual structural and piping conditions. Sleeving or thickening is not automatically an adequate structural repair for every crossing. Source: https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf

52 more in the bank

Answers and explanations for these are in the app.

  • The forms for a continuous concrete wall footing measure 20 inches wide and 5 inches deep beneath an 8-inch foundation wall, and the 20-inch width is adequate for the soil and the load. How should the inspector treat the depth of the forms?
  • The trench bottom measures 40 inches below finished grade, and the contractor intends to place an 8-inch-thick footing in it. Applying the published local frost line of 42 inches, what is the correct inspection result?
  • The completed structure is a freestanding light-frame storage building, 12 feet by 16 feet, with an 8-foot eave height, sitting on thickened-edge footings that stop 16 inches below grade and touching no other structure. What is the correct disposition?
  • One continuous plate section will run 22 feet along a foundation wall. Using half-inch anchor bolts at the code maximum spacing, with a bolt required no more than 12 inches from each end of the plate section, what is the smallest number of bolts that can hold this plate down?
  • Along one wall the half-inch anchor bolts are spaced 5 feet apart and embedded 7 inches into the concrete, but the bolt nearest the end of a plate section sits 20 inches in from that end. What is the correct finding for this wall?
  • A 30-inch-long piece of sill plate sits between a foundation step and a formed opening, and the crew has held it down with a single half-inch anchor bolt centered in its length. Everything else on the wall checks out. What should the inspector do about that short piece?
  • The basement wall encloses finished habitable space, the site is known to have a high water table, and the contractor has brushed on a bituminous dampproofing coating from the footing to grade. How should the inspector treat this exterior treatment?
  • The concrete foundation wall retains about 7 feet of earth and encloses a finished basement, and no drain pipe or drainage stone has been placed at the footing. The contractor says the dampproofing coating makes a drain unnecessary. How should the inspector respond?
  • The perforated drain pipe sits on 2 inches of washed gravel, but the stone above it is only 4 inches deep, stops flush with the outside edge of the footing, and no fabric has been laid over it before backfill. What is the correct call?
  • About 7 feet of soil is already piled against the wall, the first floor framing has not been installed, and no kickers or bracing of any kind are visible inside the basement. What should the inspector do right now?
  • At the rear of the house the landscaper has brought soil up so that the concrete foundation wall stands only 3 inches above the adjacent finished grade for a run of about 20 feet. What is the correct finding?
  • Under the main girder the framer has installed a solid sawn wood column of nominal 3-inch by 4-inch dimensions, resting on a poured pier and carrying two floor loads above. Judging the column itself, what should the inspector do?
  • The installed column is a 2-inch-diameter steel pipe set on the basement slab and welded to a plate under the girder, and no engineering has been submitted for it. What is the correct inspection outcome?
  • One pressure-preservative-treated wood post carrying the girder is set with its bottom end resting directly on the earth of the crawl space floor, with no pier or pedestal under it. How should the inspector treat this post?
  • On the side yard, which is open ground with room to work and no retaining wall or lot line in the way, the finished soil falls only 2 inches over the first 10 feet away from the foundation. What is the correct finding for that side?
  • The trench bottoms are a firm, uniform sandy clay, no soil investigation was made for the lot, and the footing widths on the approved plans were sized using an assumed load-bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot. How should the inspector treat that assumed value?
  • The soil report on file describes dense sandy gravel across the entire lot, but along one 25-foot run the trench bottom is a damp soft material that a probe rod pushes into with hand pressure. What is the appropriate response from the inspector?
  • The ascending slope behind the house is steeper than 1 unit vertical in 1 unit horizontal and rises 50 feet above the building pad, and the tape reads 12 feet from the toe of that slope to the face of the foundation wall. What should the inspector require?
  • At one corner the trench was dug roughly 14 inches below the design elevation by mistake, and the crew has pushed the loose spoil back into the hole and tamped it with the excavator bucket to bring the bottom back up to grade. How should the inspector rule on that corner?
  • Along the shaded north side of the excavation the trench bottom carries a frozen crust about 3 inches thick, and the contractor wants to place concrete on it right away because the forecast promises a thaw by afternoon. How should the inspector rule?
  • The locally adopted frost depth is 42 inches. Along the rear wall the trench bottom measures 44 inches below the ground the crew is standing on, and the approved grading plan lowers the finished grade at that wall by 8 inches. What should the inspector conclude?
  • The approved plans call for one row of vertical bars held toward the interior face of a 10-inch concrete wall, but the crew has wired the bars to the form ties so they sit centered in the form, about 5 inches from each face. How should the inspector treat this?
  • Concrete was placed to roughly mid height of an 8-foot basement wall and then stopped for three days, and the surface where the two placements meet is smooth, dusty and shows no keyway, roughening or added dowels. That wall will retain about 6 feet of earth. How should the inspector proceed?
  • Along the front wall the sill plate is held down with 3/8-inch-diameter anchor bolts spaced 4 feet apart, embedded 8 inches into the concrete, each with a nut and washer drawn tight. Judging the anchorage, what should the inspector do?
  • One plate section runs 13 feet 6 inches along the foundation and carries three half-inch anchor bolts, one set 10 inches in from each end of the piece and one at the midpoint, each embedded 7 inches into the concrete. Applying the general spacing and end distance limits, what should the inspector conclude?
  • Rather than half-inch cast-in-place bolts, the crew set galvanized steel straps into the wet concrete and bent them up over the sill plate, and the product carries an evaluation report showing capacity equal to bolts at the spacing installed. How should the inspector treat the substitution?
  • The block foundation encloses an unfinished basement, the site drains well and no high water table has been reported, and the crew has sprayed a bituminous dampproofing coating directly onto the bare block from the top of the footing upward. What should the inspector require?
  • The dampproofing on the outside of the wall begins at the top of the footing and stops roughly 18 inches below the finished grade line marked on the survey stakes, and the contractor explains that the upper part of the wall stays dry anyway. How should the inspector rule?
  • The perforated pipe is bedded in washed stone that extends past the edge of the footing and rises well above the top of the pipe, and the crew is ready to push soil back against the stone with no fabric or other covering laid over it. What should the inspector require?
  • The approved plans show no passive soil gas system, the county sits inside a zone the federal maps rate as high radon potential, and the jurisdiction adopted the residential code without adopting its radon control appendix. How should the inspector answer the builder?
  • The crew has adhered rigid foam plastic board to the outside face of the concrete foundation wall, carrying it from the sill down about 4 feet below finished grade, and the wall above supports conventional wood framing. What should the inspector do?
  • The bottom plates of the exterior walls rest directly on the concrete slab, which bears on the ground, and the plates carry no preservative treatment stamp and no sill sealer or other barrier beneath them. How should the inspector rule?
  • The material going back against the wall is excavated spoil mixed with broken form lumber, chunks of scrap concrete and frozen clods the size of a five-gallon bucket, and the operator is dropping it in full-height lifts straight down the face of the wall. What should the inspector do?
  • The soil along that wall is far softer than the design assumed, and the contractor produces a manufacturer catalog with capacity tables for a proprietary helical pier system and asks you to release the change so the crew can start installing this afternoon. What is the correct path?
  • The approved plans show the main girder delivering 1,150 pounds for every lineal foot it carries, and they rate each masonry pier with its footing at 9,200 pounds. The crew has set the piers 10 feet apart on center along the girder line. What should the inspector conclude?
  • The studs and plywood in the below-grade wall carry a treatment stamp for above-ground use, and the walls are fastened with hot-dipped galvanized nails. What is the correct finding?
  • The anchor bolts have been dropped into open cores of the top course with no grout around them, and the cores below are open to the bottom of the wall. How should the inspector judge this anchorage?
  • The longitudinal bars have been supported on broken brick so that about 1 inch of space remains between the steel and the earth beneath it. What cover does the code require in this location?
  • The wall stands 9 feet 0 inches from the top of the footing to the top of the wall, the finished exterior grade will be 1 foot 8 inches below the top of the wall, and the basement floor surface is 8 inches above the top of the footing. What is the height of unbalanced backfill?
  • Along the downhill wall the ground on the uphill side of the trench stands 12 inches higher than the ground on the downhill side, and the trench bottom measures 42 inches below the uphill grade. How does this footing stand against the required depth?
  • The plans give a 12,000-pound total load at the column and the soils information for the lot gives a presumptive load-bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot. What is the smallest square footing that will carry it?
  • The plans reproduce the footing width table for the 2,000-pound-per-square-foot soil on this lot: light-frame two stories, 15 inches; light-frame two stories with brick veneer, 21 inches. The formed footing measures 16 inches wide. What is the finding?
  • For about 12 feet the trench bottom is sound bedrock and the rest of that wall bears on firm sandy clay, with the change occurring abruptly over roughly a foot. How should the inspector judge this bearing surface?
  • The trench along the low side of the house is entirely in placed fill roughly 5 feet deep, and the contractor says the fill has had a full winter to settle. How should the inspector proceed?
  • The trench sides are sloughing as you watch, sand has run into the bottom in several places, and the trench width varies from 18 to 26 inches along its length. How should the inspector judge this proposal?
  • The crew has sprayed a bituminous dampproofing coating directly onto the block face from the footing to the grade line, over the bare units and mortar joints. What is the correct finding?
  • Over one 5-foot length the trench bottom drops 8 inches and the crew intends to place that stretch as a ramp rather than stepping it. How should the inspector judge that?
  • The crew has framed a 4-foot-wide buck for a future walkout door in a wall carrying two stories, with the wall reinforcement simply cut at the opening and nothing added above it. How should the inspector proceed?
  • The perforated pipe is correctly bedded in washed stone all the way around, and at the northeast corner it turns and discharges through the stem wall onto the crawl space grade under the adjoining wing. What is the correct finding?
  • The footing was left uncovered overnight, and this morning the top surface is frozen, crumbles under a screwdriver and shows ice crystals in the paste. How should the inspector respond?
  • The crew has formed the concrete foundation wall 6 inches thick beneath that 8-inch masonry wall, and the plans show no ledge or corbel at the top of the foundation. What is the correct finding?
  • The approved plans give a total load of 2,500 pounds coming down each deck post, and the soils information for the site gives a presumptive load-bearing value of 1,500 pounds per square foot. The crew has set 16-inch-diameter tubes. What is the finding?

Practice all 67 Footings & Foundations questions

Plus timed mock exams and a wrong book that follows you between the web and the app.

Start studying free

Other ICC B1 content areas