1. A prescriptive continuous concrete footing governed by 2021 IRC R403.1.1 is 26 inches wide and 8 inches thick, centered under an 8-inch wall. No engineered alternative is proposed. Considering only that section’s projection limit, what is the finding?
- AIt passes because each projection exceeds the minimum 2 inches
- BIt passes because extra footing width always makes the design compliant
- It fails because each 9-inch projection exceeds the 8-inch footing thickness
- DIt fails because the projection limit is always 6 inches
Where to look it up
https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf
Why C is correct
Projection per side is (26 − 8) / 2 = 9 inches. R403.1.1 requires at least 2 inches of projection and limits it to footing thickness; 9 exceeds 8. This is a prescriptive geometry deficiency. It is not proof that concrete of every possible design cannot carry the load. A proposed correction must also satisfy the applicable bearing, width, thickness, reinforcement and design requirements; narrowing the footing to 24 inches is not automatically an acceptable repair. See printed p.4-8. Source: https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/3836/Lennox/3042182/2021_International_Residential_Code.pdf
