EstatePass
CaliforniaLicensinghard20% of exam part

Which of the following scenarios would require workers' compensation coverage under California law?

Correct Answer

C) A corporation with one employee who is also the owner

Corporations must carry workers' compensation insurance for all employees, including owner-employees, regardless of ownership percentage.

Answer Options
A
A sole proprietor working alone
B
An LLC with one member-employee
C
A corporation with one employee who is also the owner
D
A partnership with two working partners only

Why This Is the Correct Answer

California Labor Code Section 3700 requires corporations to carry workers' compensation insurance for all employees, including owner-employees. Unlike sole proprietors, LLC members, or partners who may qualify for exemptions, a corporate officer who is also an employee must be covered — the corporate entity creates an employer-employee relationship that triggers mandatory coverage.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: A sole proprietor working alone

A sole proprietor working alone with no employees is exempt from workers' compensation requirements under California law. They are not their own 'employee' in the legal sense and may waive coverage for themselves.

Option B: An LLC with one member-employee

An LLC with a single member-employee may qualify for an exemption under certain conditions. Single-member LLCs where the member is the only worker can sometimes operate without coverage, though this is a nuanced area — but it is less clearly required than for a corporation.

Option D: A partnership with two working partners only

A partnership where the only workers are the two partners themselves may qualify for an exemption. Partners are not employees of the partnership in the traditional sense, and the law provides exemptions for working partners with no other employees.

Memory Technique

Remember the hierarchy of coverage requirements: Corporation with any employee (even an owner) = MUST have coverage. Sole proprietors and working partners = MAY be exempt. The corporate structure removes the 'owner exemption.'

Was this explanation helpful?

More California Questions

People Also Study

Related Study Resources

Practice More Contractor Exam Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your contractor license exam.

Start Practicing

Disclaimer: EstatePass is an independent exam preparation platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to any state contractor licensing board, the Construction Industry Licensing Board (CILB), the Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR), NASCLA, Pearson VUE, PSI, or any government agency. Exam requirements, fees, and regulations change frequently. Always verify current requirements with your state's licensing board before making decisions. Information shown was last verified on the dates indicated and may not reflect the most recent changes.