EstatePass
NASCLAContractshard15% of exam part

A subcontract agreement includes a pay-when-paid clause. The owner becomes insolvent and cannot pay the general contractor. What is the subcontractor's legal position?

Correct Answer

B) The pay-when-paid clause becomes void due to impossibility

Courts often find pay-when-paid clauses unenforceable when payment becomes impossible due to owner insolvency.

Answer Options
A
The subcontractor can demand immediate payment from the general contractor
B
The pay-when-paid clause becomes void due to impossibility
C
The subcontractor can only seek payment from the payment bond
D
The subcontractor must wait indefinitely for payment

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Courts generally treat pay-when-paid clauses as timing mechanisms, not as risk-shifting devices that permanently eliminate the subcontractor's right to payment. When owner insolvency makes payment impossible, courts frequently hold that the condition (receipt of owner payment) cannot be fulfilled, making the clause void under the doctrine of impossibility. The subcontractor retains the right to seek payment from the general contractor.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: The subcontractor can demand immediate payment from the general contractor

While the subcontractor may ultimately have the right to payment, demanding 'immediate' payment without legal process overstates the subcontractor's position. The legal path requires demonstrating that the pay-when-paid condition has been voided by impossibility β€” it is not an automatic trigger for immediate collection.

Option C: The subcontractor can only seek payment from the payment bond

Limiting the subcontractor to payment bond claims only is too narrow. A payment bond is one avenue of recovery, but it is not the exclusive remedy when a pay-when-paid clause is voided. The subcontractor may pursue the general contractor directly once impossibility voids the condition.

Option D: The subcontractor must wait indefinitely for payment

Requiring indefinite waiting would effectively convert a pay-when-paid clause into a pay-if-paid clause, eliminating any guarantee of payment. Courts generally refuse to interpret pay-when-paid clauses this broadly because it would unjustly eliminate the subcontractor's right to compensation for completed work.

Memory Technique

Pay-when-paid = WHEN (timing), not IF (condition). If 'when' becomes 'never' due to insolvency, the courts say the clause is void β€” the contractor still owes the sub.

Was this explanation helpful?

More NASCLA Questions

People Also Study

Related Study Resources

Practice More Contractor Exam Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Florida General Contractor exam.

Start Practicing

Disclaimer: EstatePass is an independent exam preparation platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to any state contractor licensing board, the Construction Industry Licensing Board (CILB), the Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR), NASCLA, Pearson VUE, PSI, or any government agency. Exam requirements, fees, and regulations change frequently. Always verify current requirements with your state's licensing board before making decisions. Information shown was last verified on the dates indicated and may not reflect the most recent changes.