EstatePass
ContractsAssignmentMEDIUM

In a real estate contract, an assignment:

Correct Answer

B) Transfers the assignor's contractual rights to a third party

An assignment transfers the assignor's contractual rights to a third party (the assignee). Unless the contract expressly prohibits assignment, it is generally permitted. Importantly, unless the other contracting party agrees to a novation, the original assignor may remain liable under the contract even after the assignment. No Nebraska Real Estate Commission approval is required for a contract assignment.

Answer Options
A
Is prohibited in all real estate contracts
B
Transfers the assignor's contractual rights to a third party
C
Automatically releases the original party from all liability
D
Requires approval from the Nebraska Real Estate Commission

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Related Topics:

novationcontract-rightswholesale-real-estatesecondary-liabilitycontract-assignment

Key Terms:

assignmentnovationassignorassigneesecondary liabilitycontract rights

Related Concepts

An option contract gives one party the exclusive right, but not the obligation, to purchase or lease a property at a specified price within a specified time period. The buyer pays option consideration to keep the option open.

A purchase agreement is a legally binding contract between a buyer and seller that outlines the terms and conditions for the sale of real property. It is also commonly called a sales contract, purchase and sale agreement, or earnest money agreement.

Specific performance is a court-ordered remedy that compels the breaching party to fulfill their obligations under the contract rather than simply paying monetary damages. It is an equitable remedy used when monetary damages would be inadequate.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

A contract where one party uses threats to force the other party to sign is considered:

Kevin and Lisa are purchasing a home in Bellevue. Their purchase and sale agreement includes both a financing contingency and an inspection contingency. The inspection reveals significant foundation issues. Kevin and Lisa request a $15,000 price reduction. The seller counters with a $5,000 reduction. Kevin and Lisa reject the counter and invoke the inspection contingency to terminate the contract. The seller argues the buyers are in breach because they should have used the financing contingency instead. Which statement is most accurate under Washington law?

Kevin and Amy are purchasing a commercial property in Worcester, Massachusetts. Their broker recommends including a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment contingency in the purchase and sale agreement. The seller argues this contingency is only relevant for industrial properties. Under Massachusetts law, why is the broker's recommendation valid for this commercial property?

Sandra agreed to sell her Fairfax County home to David for $575,000. After all contingencies were removed, Sandra received a higher offer and refused to convey the property. David wants to force Sandra to sell him the home at the agreed price. Which remedy should David pursue in Virginia court?

After a property inspection reveals minor cosmetic issues, the buyer demands $20,000 in credits. The seller refuses, and the inspection contingency deadline passes without the buyer formally canceling. What is the likely result?

People Also Study

Related Articles

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing