John signs a contract to purchase a home in Miami for $400,000, believing it includes the adjacent lot. The contract's legal description only includes the house lot. Both parties signed, but John claims mutual mistake. Under Florida law, what is the likely outcome?
Correct Answer
B) The contract is valid as written and John must perform
Correct: B - In Florida, when a contract contains a clear legal description, a party's unilateral mistake about what's included doesn't void the contract. John should have reviewed the legal description. Why not A: This is unilateral mistake by John, not mutual mistake by both parties. Why not C: Unilateral mistake generally doesn't make contracts voidable unless induced by fraud. Why not D: Contracts include only what's in the legal description, not assumptions.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Deep Analysis of This Real Estate Contracts Question
Background Knowledge for Real Estate Contracts
Real World Application in Real Estate Contracts
Common Mistakes to Avoid on Real Estate Contracts Questions
Related Topics & Key Terms
Key Terms:
More Real Estate Contracts Questions
A buyer and seller in Florida agree to a purchase price of $300,000 with the buyer assuming the seller's existing mortgage. The contract must include which specific disclosure?
All of the following are required elements of a valid Florida real estate purchase contract EXCEPT:
A seller accepts a buyer's offer on their Florida home but dies before closing. The seller's estate representative wants to cancel the contract. What is the legal status?
The effective date of a Florida real estate contract is:
The FAR/BAR residential contract requires earnest money held by:
- → In Florida, the inspection period is typically:
- → A buyer signs a Florida purchase contract for a condo and learns during the inspection period about a special assessment of $10,000. The seller knew but didn't disclose this. What are the buyer's rights?
- → A buyer and seller in Florida agree to extend the closing date by 10 days. The original contract had a 'time is of the essence' clause. What must they do to make this extension valid?
- → In Florida real estate contracts, what legal principle requires that both parties exchange something of value?
- → A Florida real estate licensee prepares a purchase agreement that includes a financing contingency. The buyer fails to apply for financing within the specified timeframe. What is the legal consequence under Florida contract law?
- → Under Florida law, all of the following would typically survive the closing of a real estate purchase agreement EXCEPT:
- → A Florida purchase contract includes an appraisal contingency stating the property must appraise for at least the purchase price of $350,000. The appraisal comes in at $340,000. What options does the buyer have?
- → A Florida real estate purchase contract includes a financing contingency requiring loan approval within 30 days. On day 28, the buyer hasn't received approval but hasn't notified the seller. What is the buyer's status?
- → In a Florida real estate transaction, the purchase agreement includes a mortgage contingency clause. The buyer receives a loan commitment letter with an interest rate 0.5% higher than specified in the contract. What are the buyer's rights?
- → A Florida real estate broker prepares a purchase agreement that incorrectly states the lot size as 15,000 sq ft when it's actually 12,000 sq ft. The error is discovered after contract execution but before closing. What is the buyer's most likely remedy?
People Also Study
Buyer Representation Agreement
8% of exam
Property Ownership
10% of exam
Land Use Controls and Regulations
8% of exam
Valuation and Market Analysis
10% of exam
Previous Question
A Florida broker presents a written offer from a buyer to a seller. The seller verbally accepts all terms but says she'll sign the contract tomorrow. Before signing, the seller receives a better offer and refuses to sign the original contract. What is the buyer's legal position?
Next Question
A Florida real estate contract states the purchase price as 'Three hundred thousand and 00/100 dollars' but numerically shows '$30,000.00'. The buyer claims the price is $30,000 while the seller claims $300,000. Under Florida law, if this goes to court, what price would likely be enforced?