A conservation easement permanently limits development on a parcel. How does this affect site value?
Correct Answer
A) Analyze its effect on feasible uses and market value
Analyze the actual restriction and the property’s reasonably probable highest and best use, comparing supported market value with and without the restriction. A restriction that removes valuable feasible development potential can reduce value, but acreage restricted or tax benefits alone do not quantify the change.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because market value must be premised on highest and best use, and a conservation easement can change which uses are legally permissible. The appraiser analyzes the actual restriction, its effect on feasible uses and the supported market value with and without it. Where valuable development potential is removed, value can decline.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: Add the owner’s income-tax deduction to site value
Option B, adding the owner's income-tax deduction to site value, is wrong because a tax benefit to a particular owner is not a characteristic of the real estate that the market pays for in site value. The easement's effect is measured through its impact on uses and market value.
Option C: Assume it changes ownership of the entire parcel
Option C, assuming the easement changes ownership of the entire parcel, is wrong because a conservation easement restricts certain rights while the owner keeps title to the land. It limits development rather than transferring the whole parcel.
Option D: Apply a discount equal to the percentage of acreage restricted
Option D, applying a discount equal to the percentage of acreage restricted, is wrong because the value effect depends on what development potential and uses are lost, not on a mechanical acreage percentage. A restriction on low-value acreage may affect value far less than its share of the area.
Restriction changes uses, then value
Ask what the easement stops the land from doing, then measure what the market pays for the land with and without that ability.
How to use: Use this when a question asks how a deed restriction or easement affects value.
Exam Tip
Prefer answers that call for analysis of use and market value over answers that apply a fixed formula or add a tax benefit.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Discounting value by the percentage of acreage restricted
- -Adding tax benefits to site value
- -Assuming an easement transfers title to the whole parcel
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests how a legally enforceable restriction such as a conservation easement affects value. The appraiser must analyze how the restriction changes reasonably probable uses and market value, often by comparing value with and without the restriction. Simple formulas based on acreage or tax benefits do not measure that change.
Background Knowledge
Highest and best use must be legally permissible, so legally enforceable restrictions such as conservation easements shape the analysis. A before-and-after comparison of supported market value is a common way to measure an easement's effect.
Real-World Application
A rancher grants a conservation easement barring subdivision of 400 acres. The appraiser estimates the land's market value before the easement, with residential development potential, and after, limited to agricultural use, and reports the difference.
More Land/Site Questions
How should an appraiser account for a site's access to public sewer compared with competing sites that require septic systems?
Which fact, if supported by competitive-market evidence, most directly supports a unit-price premium for an otherwise comparable site?
A rectangular site's frontage is doubled while its depth is halved, keeping area constant. What is the likely value effect in a retail district?
A downtown site's zoning height limit is reduced from six stories to three. Buyers in this market had been paying for six-story development potential. What effect on land value is most supportable?
A zoning change increases permitted density from four to eight units per acre. What is the likely effect on site value?
Using the allocation method, market evidence supports a typical land-to-total-property-value ratio of 28% for similar improved properties in the subject’s location. An improved comparable sold for $825,000. What land (site) contribution is indicated by applying that ratio?
An appraiser is valuing a vacant site near a landfill. A similar vacant site that is not affected by the landfill sold for $480,000. Paired land sales indicate that proximity to the landfill lowers site prices by $70,000. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated value of the subject site?
An appraiser is extracting site value from a $600,000 cash sale. The seller's records show an original construction cost of $250,000 and a depreciated book value of $110,000. The appraiser estimates current replacement cost new at $400,000 and accrued depreciation from all causes at $100,000. What is the indicated site value?
Three parcels assembled under single ownership (standard appraisal guidance assemblage) support separate as-is values of $290,000, $340,000, and $250,000. After assemblage for a higher-utility use, the combined site is valued at $1,050,000. Assemblage costs (demolition, legal, holding, and related) total $55,000. What is the indicated net plottage (plottage increment after assemblage costs)?
A comparable commercial site with 65 front feet sold for a cash-equivalent price of $585,000. Per standard appraisal guidance, sale price per front foot is a vacant-land unit of comparison when frontage is a primary value determinant. The subject site has 72 front feet and is otherwise similar. What indicated land value does the front-foot unit support before other adjustments?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
The subject vacant site has shared access over a driveway easement. A comparable vacant site with unencumbered access sold for $410,000. Paired land sales indicate a $55,000 discount for shared access. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated value of the subject site?
Next Question
Which of the following would most likely be classified as excess land?