EstatePass
Ethics & Fraudeasy18% of exam

An MLO tells a borrower that an optional identity-theft product is required by federal law and finances its fee into the loan. In fact, no such requirement exists. What should the compliance review conclude?

Correct Answer

B) The false statement and unauthorized product present deceptive loan-packing concerns

Why this is correct: The MLO's false statement that a product is federally required is deceptive and deprives the borrower of informed consent. Adding an unauthorized, financed fee to the loan is a classic example of loan packing, which is an abusive practice. The core violation is the misrepresentation and the addition of an unearned charge, not the method of payment. Why the other choices are wrong: The charge is not acceptable because it was financed, as financing a deceptive fee does not cure the underlying fraud. The product does not become mandatory once disclosed at closing; optional products remain optional regardless of disclosure timing. The issue matters long before default, as the deceptive act occurs at origination and violates fair lending laws irrespective of the loan's performance. Exam tip: Remember that lying about a legal requirement to sell a product is always deceptive and a red flag for loan packing, regardless of whether the fee is paid upfront or financed.

Answer Options
A
The charge is acceptable because it was financed
B
The false statement and unauthorized product present deceptive loan-packing concerns
C
The product becomes mandatory once disclosed at closing
D
The issue matters only if the borrower defaults

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Why this is correct: The MLO's false statement that a product is federally required is deceptive and deprives the borrower of informed consent. Adding an unauthorized, financed fee to the loan is a classic example of loan packing, which is an abusive practice. The core violation is the misrepresentation and the addition of an unearned charge, not the method of payment. Why the other choices are wrong: The charge is not acceptable because it was financed, as financing a deceptive fee does not cure the underlying fraud. The product does not become mandatory once disclosed at closing; optional products remain optional regardless of disclosure timing. The issue matters long before default, as the deceptive act occurs at origination and violates fair lending laws irrespective of the loan's performance. Exam tip: Remember that lying about a legal requirement to sell a product is always deceptive and a red flag for loan packing, regardless of whether the fee is paid upfront or financed.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Ethics & Fraud Questions

In a closing-readiness check, a disclosure specialist sees facts tied to Appraisal Fraud Detection. What should the file reflect?

An MLO recommends a loan with a low initial payment that will increase sharply in two years. The borrower says retirement income will be fixed and asks whether the payment can change. What is the appropriate response?

An MLO alters a bank statement to make the applicant's account balance appear higher and submits it to underwriting. Which response is appropriate?

A branch manager asks about a loan file because marketing proposes a rate the company is not prepared to offer. What should happen?

A borrower wants cash for necessary home repairs. A proposed refinance provides $15,000 cash but adds $12,000 in costs and extends repayment by 15 years. What is the best next step for the MLO?

Before closing, the team discovers that an ad shows an interest rate but omits the APR presentation. What is the safest compliant answer?

The loan team is resolving Privacy and Confidentiality during a quality-control sample. Which action best fits the rule?

A house last sold for $185,000 in January. In March it changes hands 3 times in 9 days, reaching $410,000, with the same appraiser and the same closing agent on every leg. Assuming the parties colluded to inflate appraisals without improvements to support the higher prices, what fraud scheme does this pattern illustrate?

For closings involving federally related mortgage loans, a title company pays a real estate brokerage $75 for each referred client who closes. The brokerage only passes along the client’s name and number. Does this referral payment comply with RESPA Section 8?

Before closing, the team discovers that a loan officer wants different terms because of a protected applicant characteristic. What is the safest compliant answer?

People Also Study

Related Study Resources

Practice More MLO Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your SAFE MLO exam.

Start Practicing