An appraiser discovers that a comparable sale occurred between related parties at a below-market price. According to USPAP, the appraiser should:
Correct Answer
B) Reject the sale as not arm's length and seek other comparables
Related party transactions that are not arm's length should generally be rejected as comparables since they don't reflect market value. The appraiser should seek other comparables that better represent market conditions.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
USPAP requires that comparable sales reflect market value, which necessitates arm's length transactions between unrelated parties. Related party sales at below-market prices indicate non-market motivations and should be rejected as they don't represent what typical buyers and sellers would agree upon. The appraiser's duty is to find comparables that accurately reflect market conditions, not to attempt adjustments that cannot reliably correct for non-market motivations. Seeking other arm's length comparables ensures the appraisal reflects true market value.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Use the sale but make an upward adjustment for the relationship
Making an upward adjustment assumes the appraiser can accurately quantify the impact of the relationship, which is often impossible since the motivations behind related party transactions are typically unknown and non-market driven.
Option C: Use the sale without adjustment since it's a market transaction
While it may technically be a market transaction, it's not an arm's length transaction, which is required for comparables under USPAP since related parties often have motivations other than market considerations.
Option D: Average the sale price with other comparables to minimize the impact
Averaging with other comparables would contaminate the analysis with non-market data, potentially skewing the final value conclusion and violating USPAP's requirement for market-based comparables.
ARM's Length = REJECT Related
ARM'S LENGTH CHECK: Always Reject Motivations that aren't Strictly LENGTH (market-based). If parties are related, LENGTH is compromised - reject and find new comparables.
How to use: When you see 'related parties' or 'below-market' in a question about comparables, immediately think 'ARM'S LENGTH CHECK' and remember that related = reject, then seek new comparables.
Exam Tip
Look for key phrases like 'related parties,' 'family members,' 'business partners,' or 'below-market price' - these are red flags that indicate non-arm's length transactions that should be rejected as comparables.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Attempting to adjust related party sales instead of rejecting them
- -Assuming all recorded sales are automatically arm's length transactions
- -Using related party sales when other comparables are available
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests understanding of USPAP's requirements for comparable sales and the arm's length transaction principle. Under USPAP, appraisers must use sales that reflect market value, which requires transactions between unrelated parties acting in their own best interests. Related party transactions often involve motivations other than market considerations, such as family relationships, business partnerships, or other non-market factors. When a sale occurs between related parties at below-market prices, it indicates the transaction was not conducted under typical market conditions and therefore doesn't represent what an unrelated buyer would pay.
Background Knowledge
USPAP requires that comparable sales be arm's length transactions that reflect market value, meaning they must occur between unrelated parties acting in their own best interests without duress or special motivations. Related party transactions often involve considerations other than market value, such as family relationships, business partnerships, or tax strategies.
Real-World Application
In practice, appraisers often encounter sales between family members, business entities with common ownership, or distressed situations where relationships affect pricing. These must be identified through research and rejected in favor of true market transactions between unrelated parties.
More USPAP Questions
An extraordinary assumption must be:
Under the USPAP Competency Rule, which of the following is required before an appraiser may accept an assignment?
An appraiser is developing an appraisal for a bank loan and discovers that the property has environmental contamination that significantly affects value, but the lender specifically requests that this issue not be mentioned in the report. According to USPAP, the appraiser should:
A Summary Appraisal Report must contain enough information to:
According to USPAP's Ethics Rule, an appraiser must keep confidential information about the client and intended users confidential unless disclosure is required by:
People Also Study
Valuation Principles & Procedures
25% of exam
Property Description & Analysis
20% of exam
Market Analysis & Highest/Best Use
15% of exam
Appraisal Math & Statistics
15% of exam
Report Writing & Compliance
10% of exam