A state law requires appraisers to use a specific format that conflicts with USPAP reporting requirements. In this situation, the appraiser should:
Correct Answer
B) Invoke a jurisdictional exception and comply with the state law
When law or regulation conflicts with USPAP, an appraiser may invoke a jurisdictional exception to comply with the legal requirement while noting the deviation from USPAP in the report.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B correctly identifies the proper use of a jurisdictional exception under USPAP Standards Rule 2-2(a)(viii) and other applicable sections. When law or regulation conflicts with USPAP, appraisers are permitted and expected to comply with the legal requirement while invoking a jurisdictional exception. The appraiser must clearly identify and explain the parts of USPAP that are set aside and cite the law or regulation that necessitated the exception. This approach maintains legal compliance while preserving professional integrity through proper disclosure.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Follow USPAP and ignore the state law
Following USPAP while ignoring state law would put the appraiser in violation of applicable legal requirements, which could result in legal consequences, license suspension, or other penalties. USPAP itself recognizes that compliance with law takes precedence over USPAP requirements when conflicts arise.
Option C: Decline all assignments in that state
Declining all assignments in a state due to format conflicts is unnecessarily restrictive and ignores the jurisdictional exception mechanism that USPAP provides specifically for these situations. This approach would limit the appraiser's practice area without justification when a proper solution exists.
Option D: Use whichever standard is less restrictive
Using whichever standard is less restrictive is not the correct approach and misunderstands the purpose of jurisdictional exceptions. The choice should be based on legal requirements, not on which standard is more or less restrictive. This could result in non-compliance with either USPAP or applicable law.
JEL Method
JEL = Jurisdictional Exception for Law. When law conflicts with USPAP, invoke a Jurisdictional Exception and follow the Law while disclosing the deviation.
How to use: When you see a question about conflicts between USPAP and legal requirements, think 'JEL' - the answer will involve using a jurisdictional exception to comply with the law while properly disclosing the USPAP deviation.
Exam Tip
Look for keywords like 'state law requires,' 'regulation mandates,' or 'legal requirement' combined with 'conflicts with USPAP' - these signal jurisdictional exception questions where compliance with law takes precedence.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Thinking USPAP always takes precedence over state law
- -Believing jurisdictional exceptions allow appraisers to ignore USPAP entirely
- -Failing to properly disclose and explain the jurisdictional exception in the report
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests understanding of jurisdictional exceptions under USPAP, which is a critical concept for appraisers working across different states with varying legal requirements. USPAP recognizes that appraisers must comply with applicable laws and regulations, even when they conflict with USPAP standards. The jurisdictional exception provision allows appraisers to deviate from USPAP requirements when law or regulation requires it, but mandates proper disclosure of the deviation. This balances professional standards with legal compliance requirements that appraisers face in practice.
Background Knowledge
USPAP provides for jurisdictional exceptions when law or regulation conflicts with USPAP requirements, allowing appraisers to comply with legal mandates while maintaining professional standards through proper disclosure. The appraiser must identify the specific USPAP requirement being set aside and cite the conflicting law or regulation in their report.
Real-World Application
In practice, appraisers frequently encounter state-specific reporting formats for tax assessment appeals, eminent domain cases, or regulatory filings that may not align perfectly with USPAP report formats, requiring proper use of jurisdictional exceptions to maintain both legal compliance and professional standards.
More USPAP Questions
An extraordinary assumption must be:
Under the USPAP Competency Rule, which of the following is required before an appraiser may accept an assignment?
An appraiser is developing an appraisal for a bank loan and discovers that the property has environmental contamination that significantly affects value, but the lender specifically requests that this issue not be mentioned in the report. According to USPAP, the appraiser should:
A Summary Appraisal Report must contain enough information to:
According to USPAP's Ethics Rule, an appraiser must keep confidential information about the client and intended users confidential unless disclosure is required by:
People Also Study
Valuation Principles & Procedures
25% of exam
Property Description & Analysis
20% of exam
Market Analysis & Highest/Best Use
15% of exam
Appraisal Math & Statistics
15% of exam
Report Writing & Compliance
10% of exam