Under Minnesota law, refusing to rent based on receipt of public assistance is:
Correct Answer
B) Illegal discrimination
Minnesota prohibits discrimination based on status with regard to public assistance, including Section 8 vouchers.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
B is correct because Minnesota's Human Rights Act explicitly includes public assistance as a protected class under fair housing laws, making it illegal for landlords to refuse to rent based solely on a prospective tenant's receipt of public assistance, including Section 8 vouchers.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Legal
A is incorrect because Minnesota law specifically prohibits discrimination based on public assistance status. This protection extends statewide, not just in certain municipalities, and applies to all housing providers.
Option C: Only illegal in Minneapolis
C is incorrect because this protection is not limited to Minneapolis. Minnesota's Human Rights Act applies statewide, making refusal to rent based on public assistance illegal throughout the entire state.
Option D: At landlord discretion
D is incorrect because while landlords have discretion in tenant selection, this discretion does not extend to discriminatory practices based on protected classes, including public assistance status.
Deep Analysis of This Practice Of Real Estate Question
This question tests understanding of fair housing protections under Minnesota law, specifically regarding discrimination based on public assistance status. The concept matters because fair housing violations can lead to significant legal consequences for real estate professionals, including fines, license suspension, and civil lawsuits. The question's core concept is that Minnesota law explicitly prohibits refusing to rent based on receipt of public assistance, including Section 8 vouchers. To arrive at the correct answer, one must recognize that Minnesota's Human Rights Act includes public assistance as a protected class, making such refusal illegal statewide. This question is challenging because many landlords may have misconceptions about their discretion in tenant selection or believe local ordinances vary more than they do. The correct answer connects to broader knowledge of fair housing protections, which generally prohibit discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, and national origin, with Minnesota adding additional protections including public assistance status.
Background Knowledge for Practice Of Real Estate
Fair housing laws originated with the federal Fair Housing Act of 1968, which prohibited discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Minnesota expanded these protections through its Human Rights Act, adding additional protected classes including public assistance status. This means that in Minnesota, landlords cannot refuse to rent to someone because they receive public assistance, such as Section 8 vouchers. This protection exists to ensure equal housing opportunities regardless of economic status. The Minnesota Department of Human Rights enforces these regulations, and violations can result in substantial penalties. Many states have similar protections, but Minnesota is one that explicitly includes public assistance as a protected class.
Memory Technique
analogyThink of public assistance vouchers like a debit card - it's just a method of payment, not a reflection of a person's character or ability to be a good tenant.
When encountering questions about discrimination based on public assistance, remember that it's no different than discrimination based on any other protected class - it's illegal in Minnesota.
Exam Tip for Practice Of Real Estate
For fair housing questions in Minnesota, always consider if the protected class mentioned is included in the state's Human Rights Act, which includes additional protections beyond federal law.
Real World Application in Practice Of Real Estate
A property manager in St. Paul receives two rental applications for the same apartment. One applicant has excellent credit and steady employment, while the other receives Section 8 vouchers but has positive rental history. The property manager is tempted to choose the first applicant because they believe the voucher recipient might be 'trouble.' Under Minnesota law, this would be illegal discrimination. The property manager must evaluate both applicants using the same criteria, and cannot refuse to rent to the voucher recipient solely because of their source of income.
Common Mistakes to Avoid on Practice Of Real Estate Questions
- •Assuming that landlords have unlimited discretion in tenant selection
- •Confusing state law protections with federal fair housing protections
- •Believing that local ordinances create more variation in fair housing protections than actually exists
Related Topics & Key Terms
Related Topics:
Key Terms:
More Practice Of Real Estate Questions
For a month-to-month tenancy to be legally valid, which must the contract include?
A landlord must give a month-to-month tenant how many days' notice to terminate the tenancy in California (for tenancies less than one year)?
Under Florida fair housing law, advertising that states 'near church' is:
In NYC, a security deposit for residential rentals cannot exceed:
Is commingling legal in Illinois?
People Also Study
Buyer Representation Agreement
8% of exam
Property Ownership
10% of exam
Land Use Controls and Regulations
8% of exam
Valuation and Market Analysis
10% of exam