EstatePass
ContractsBreach_and_remediesHARD

Under California Civil Code §1689, which of the following is NOT a legally recognized ground for rescission of a real estate contract after the contingency period has expired?

Correct Answer

C) The buyer's dissatisfaction with the neighborhood after reconsidering the purchase decision

Under California Civil Code §1689, rescission is a legal remedy available only on specific statutory grounds, including fraud, mutual mistake, failure of consideration, and material breach. A buyer's subjective change of mind or dissatisfaction with the neighborhood is not a recognized legal ground for rescission. Once contingency periods have expired, the buyer is bound by the contract and cannot rescind simply because of a personal change in preference.

Answer Options
A
Mutual mistake of a material fact that existed at the time the contract was formed
B
Fraud or intentional misrepresentation by the seller regarding a material condition of the property
C
The buyer's dissatisfaction with the neighborhood after reconsidering the purchase decision
D
Failure of consideration due to the seller's inability to convey marketable title

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

rescissiongroundsCivil_Code_1689reverse
Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

People Also Study

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing