EstatePass
ContractsContract_validityMEDIUM

A contract signed under duress is considered:

Correct Answer

B) Voidable at the option of the coerced party

A contract signed under duress is voidable, not void. The party who was coerced has the right to affirm or disaffirm the contract. If the coerced party chooses to ratify the contract after the duress has ended, it becomes enforceable.

Answer Options
A
Void and unenforceable by either party
B
Voidable at the option of the coerced party
C
Valid and fully enforceable
D
Ratified upon performance by either party

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Related Topics:

Void vs. voidable contractsUndue influenceFraud and misrepresentationMutual assentRatification and disaffirmanceIowa common law contract principles

Key Terms:

duressvoidablevoidcoercionmutual assentundue influenceratificationdisaffirmanceIowa contract lawfree will
Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

People Also Study

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing