EstatePass
ContractsContract_validityMEDIUM

A contract signed under duress is considered:

Correct Answer

B) Voidable, at the option of the party who was coerced

A contract signed under duress is voidable, not void. The party who was coerced may choose to affirm (ratify) or rescind the contract. This differs from a contract formed for an illegal purpose, which is void ab initio and cannot be ratified by either party. Ratification does not occur automatically after duress ends — the coerced party must take an affirmative action to affirm the contract.

Answer Options
A
Void, because it has no legal effect from the beginning
B
Voidable, at the option of the party who was coerced
C
Valid and fully enforceable by both parties
D
Ratified automatically once the duress has ended

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Related Topics:

void contractsvoidable contractsundue influencemutual assentratificationrescission

Key Terms:

duressvoidablevoidratificationrescissionmutual assent
Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

People Also Study

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing