Under the CFL, what is the maximum interest rate a licensed finance lender can charge on a consumer loan of $2,500?
Correct Answer
D) 36% per annum plus the federal funds rate
For a California Financing Law consumer loan with a bona fide principal amount of at least $2,500 but less than $10,000, Financial Code section 22304.5 caps charges at an annual simple interest rate of 36% per annum plus the federal funds rate.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
36% per annum plus the federal funds rate is correct. For a California Financing Law consumer loan with a bona fide principal amount of at least $2,500 but less than $10,000, Financial Code section 22304.5 caps charges at an annual simple interest rate of 36% per annum plus the federal funds rate. Option D is correct because the $2,500 loan falls into the CFL loan-size band governed by the 36% per annum plus federal funds rate cap.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: 10% per annum
10% is the general California usury rate for unlicensed lenders, not the CFL rate schedule.
Option B: 2.5% per month
2.5% per month is not the CFL cap for this loan-size band; the statute uses an annual simple interest cap of 36% plus the federal funds rate.
Option C: Any rate agreed upon by the parties
Rates are not unlimited even for licensed lenders. The CFL rate schedule applies.
Memory Technique
CA -> ca-cfl-finance-lenders-brokers-licensing-records-reports
Exam Tip
CFL questions often test whether the person is lending, brokering, doing MLO activity, using a branch, meeting residential mortgage net worth and bond requirements, keeping records, filing reports, or facing DFPI examination/enforcement authority.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Using a national baseline answer when California has agency-specific DFPI or DRE requirements
- -Confusing CFL, CRMLA, covered-loan, usury, servicing, and DRE endorsement rules
- -Relying on legacy California state-exam or education assumptions instead of current NMLS source pages
More UST Questions
In a pricing desk question, an audit analyst sees facts tied to Prohibited Misrepresentation. What should the file reflect?
An applicant previously had an MLO license revoked by a state regulator. Under the SAFE Act minimum standards for a new state-licensed MLO license, which statement is correct?
Which statement correctly distinguishes a license suspension from a license revocation?
A state regulator has issued an order suspending an MLO's authority effective immediately. The MLO has filed an appeal, but no stay has been granted. What should the MLO do?
An MLO license application asks whether the applicant has been the subject of a regulatory order. The applicant has a recent consent order that falls within the question. What is the proper response?
Why does NMLS maintain licensing and enforcement information that participating regulators can access?
A regulator issues a final license suspension without giving the MLO notice of the alleged violation or any opportunity to respond, even though applicable law requires both. What issue is presented?
A regulator finds that an MLO charged consumers prohibited fees. Which set of actions is consistent with the enforcement tools contemplated by Regulation H?
An MLO's license status in NMLS changes to suspended, with no stay or reinstatement shown. What is the immediate operational effect?
Which fact most directly supports disciplinary action against an MLO rather than merely a request for additional application information?
People Also Study
Federal Mortgage-Related Laws
24% of exam
General Mortgage Knowledge
20% of exam
Mortgage Loan Origination Activities
27% of exam
Ethics, Fraud & Consumer Protection
18% of exam