A private party lender in California makes a $200,000 loan to a borrower secured by a second deed of trust. The lender is not a licensed broker and charges 12% annual interest. The current SF Federal Reserve discount rate is 3%. Which statement is TRUE?
Correct Answer
A) The loan is usurious because the rate exceeds the constitutional limit of 10%
The usury limit is the greater of 10% or 5% + 3% (Fed rate) = 8%. Since 10% is greater, the ceiling is 10%. At 12%, the loan exceeds this limit. The lender is a private party (not exempt), and simply being secured by real property does not create an exemption without a licensed broker arranging the transaction.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
The loan is usurious because the rate exceeds the constitutional limit of 10% is correct. The usury limit is the greater of 10% or 5% + 3% (Fed rate) = 8%. Since 10% is greater, the ceiling is 10%. At 12%, the loan exceeds this limit. The lender is a private party (not exempt), and simply being secured by real property does not create an exemption without a licensed broker arranging the transaction. The usury limit is the greater of 10% or 5% + 3% (Fed rate) = 8%. Since 10% is greater, the ceiling is 10%. At 12%, the loan exceeds this limit. The lender is a private party (not exempt), and simply being secured by real property does not create an exemption without a licensed broker arranging the transaction.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: The loan is not usurious because it is secured by real property
Being secured by real property alone does not create a usury exemption; the exemption requires a licensed broker to arrange the loan.
Option C: The loan is not usurious because the usury limit does not apply to second trust deeds
There is no distinction in usury law between first and second trust deeds; the usury ceiling applies regardless of lien position.
Option D: The loan is usurious because the rate exceeds the constitutional limit of 8%
While 5% + 3% = 8% is one prong of the formula, the usury limit is the GREATER of that amount or 10%, so the ceiling is 10%, not 8%.
Memory Technique
CA -> ca-usury-real-estate-broker-exemptions-interest-penalties
Exam Tip
Usury questions require separating personal-purpose loans, other-use loans, regulated-lender exemptions, real estate broker arranged real-property loans, and nonexempt private-lender scenarios.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Using a national baseline answer when California has agency-specific DFPI or DRE requirements
- -Confusing CFL, CRMLA, covered-loan, usury, servicing, and DRE endorsement rules
- -Relying on legacy California state-exam or education assumptions instead of current NMLS source pages
More UST Questions
In a pricing desk question, an audit analyst sees facts tied to Prohibited Misrepresentation. What should the file reflect?
An applicant previously had an MLO license revoked by a state regulator. Under the SAFE Act minimum standards for a new state-licensed MLO license, which statement is correct?
Which statement correctly distinguishes a license suspension from a license revocation?
A state regulator has issued an order suspending an MLO's authority effective immediately. The MLO has filed an appeal, but no stay has been granted. What should the MLO do?
An MLO license application asks whether the applicant has been the subject of a regulatory order. The applicant has a recent consent order that falls within the question. What is the proper response?
Why does NMLS maintain licensing and enforcement information that participating regulators can access?
A regulator issues a final license suspension without giving the MLO notice of the alleged violation or any opportunity to respond, even though applicable law requires both. What issue is presented?
A regulator finds that an MLO charged consumers prohibited fees. Which set of actions is consistent with the enforcement tools contemplated by Regulation H?
An MLO's license status in NMLS changes to suspended, with no stay or reinstatement shown. What is the immediate operational effect?
Which fact most directly supports disciplinary action against an MLO rather than merely a request for additional application information?
People Also Study
Federal Mortgage-Related Laws
24% of exam
General Mortgage Knowledge
20% of exam
Mortgage Loan Origination Activities
27% of exam
Ethics, Fraud & Consumer Protection
18% of exam